[2021] KEELRC 272 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 272 (KLR)

The court found that the claimants had not properly served the respondents in accordance with Rule 11 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, as the email addresses used for service were not the official addresses of the respondents. Proper service is a mandatory procedural requirement before...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 272 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fardosa Abdikadir Hussein; Applicant: Abdirizak Said Adan; Applicant: Abdisalam Sheikh Mohamed; Applicant: Mohamed Ibrahim Abdi; Respondent: Garisa County Public Service Board; Respondent: His Excellency the Governor, Garissa County
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E373 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application for Default Judgment
Outcome
application for default judgment deferred pending proper service
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Default Judgment, Employment Contracts, Gratuity Claims
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Service of Process Default Judgment Employment Contracts Gratuity Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fardosa Abdikadir Hussein

Applicant

Abdirizak Said Adan

Applicant

Abdisalam Sheikh Mohamed

Applicant

Mohamed Ibrahim Abdi

Applicant

Garisa County Public Service Board

Respondent

His Excellency the Governor, Garissa County

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application for Default Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondents were properly served with summons as required by law.
  2. 2 Whether default judgment can be entered against the respondents for failure to enter appearance or file a defence.
  3. 3 Whether the claimants are entitled to the liquidated sum claimed as gratuity.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimants had not properly served the respondents in accordance with Rule 11 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules, as the email addresses used for service were not the official addresses of the respondents. Proper service is a mandatory procedural requirement before default judgment can be considered. The court therefore directed the claimants to effect direct service on the respondents using the official contact details, or to apply for alternative service if physical service is not possible, before the application for default judgment could be entertained.

Court Disposition

application for default judgment deferred pending proper service

Orders

  • Claimants to directly serve the respondents pursuant to Rule 11 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules within 14 days.
  • Where physical service is not possible, claimants to apply for alternative service under Rule 11(8) and (9).