[2014] KEHC 1046 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had filed summons for revocation of grant on grounds of alleged fraudulent concealment of material facts. Given that the respondents were in the process of executing the grant, and in the absence of opposition from the respondents, the court held that it was just and equitable to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 1046 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Faith Wambui; Respondent: Michael Marui Ndambiri; Respondent: Florence Wanjiru Waithanje
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 417 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application for Preservation Orders Pending Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- Application allowed in terms of prayers 2 and 3.
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Succession and Inheritance, Preservation of Estate, Fraudulent Concealment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Faith Wambui
Applicant
Michael Marui Ndambiri
Respondent
Florence Wanjiru Waithanje
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Application for Preservation Orders Pending Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to preservation orders over land parcel KABARE/NYANGATI/4031 pending determination of summons for revocation of grant.
- 2 Whether the grant was obtained fraudulently through concealment of material facts.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had filed summons for revocation of grant on grounds of alleged fraudulent concealment of material facts. Given that the respondents were in the process of executing the grant, and in the absence of opposition from the respondents, the court held that it was just and equitable to preserve the status quo over the disputed land parcel and prohibit registration of the grant until the revocation application is determined. This ensures that the applicant's right to be heard is protected and that the estate is not dissipated before the substantive issues are resolved.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in terms of prayers 2 and 3.
Orders
- Status quo over land parcel KABARE/NYANGATI/4031 to be maintained on the ground and in the Land Registry records pending hearing and determination of the application for revocation of grant.
- The Land Registrar Kirinyaga is prohibited from registering the grant issued to the respondents over land parcel KABARE/NYANGATI/4031 pending hearing and determination of this matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT EMBU
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 417 OF 2007
In the matter of the Estate of SARAH MUMBI NDAMBIRI (Deceased)
FAITH WAMBUI....................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
MICHAEL MARUI NDAMBIRI &
FLORENCE WANJIRU WAITHANJE...RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
The applicant Faith Wambui through her advocate Messrs Igati Mwai & Co. Advocates in her application dated 24/10/2014 seeks for orders:-
That this application be certified as urgent and be heard exparte in the first instance.
That the status quo over land parcel No. KABARE/NYANGATI/4031 be maintained on the ground, and on the Land Registry records pending the hearing and determination of this application for revocation of grant herein.
That the land Registrar Kirinyaga be prohibited from registering the grant issued to the respondent over land parcel KABARE/NYANGATI/4031 pending the hearing and determination of this matter.
Costs of this application be in cause.
The grounds supporting the application are that there are summons for revocation of grant filed by the applicant in respect of LR. KABARE/NYANGATI/4031. The respondents who are administrators of the deceased's estate are said to be in the process of executing the grant which process may jeopardize the interests of the applicant.
The 1st respondent did not file a replying affidavit but responded to the application orally in court. He said that the applicant is his sister in law who has sold most of the deceased's land leaving only 1½ acres for the respondents. She has another land measuring 4 acres of her own. The 1st respondent did not in any way oppose the application. The 2nd respondent did not file a replying affidavit and did not attend court on the date of hearing.
The grant herein was confirmed on 20/12/2012 with the respondents getting their respective shares of 0. 5 acres and 1 acre. The applicant's name does not feature in the list of dependants in Form P & A5. The applicant in the supporting affidavit depones that the deceased Sarah Muthoni Ndambiri is her mother. She alleges that the grant was obtained fraudulently through concealment of material facts. Having filed summons for revocation of grant, the applicant ought to be given a chance to be heard before the grant can be executed.
I therefore find the application merited and allow it in terms of prayers 2 and 3 only.
It is hereby so ordered.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014.
F. MUCHEMI
J U D G E
In the presence of:-
1st Respondent Michael Marui
F. MUCHEMI
J U D G E