[2017] KEKC 20 (KLR)

[2017] KEKC 20 (KLR)

The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to the petitioner’s admitted adultery and abandonment of the matrimonial home and children. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence for her claims regarding maintenance, abuse, and ownership of property. The court held that the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEKC 20 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: FAJ; Respondent: SJH
Court
Kadhis Courts
Court Station
Kadhis Court at Garbatulla
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
1 November 2017
Case Number
Divorce Cause 16 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Marriage dissolved; custody of minor children awarded to respondent; petitioner denied maintenance and property ownership; petitioner entitled to personal effects and access to children.
Legal Topics
Dissolution of Marriage, Custody of Children, Matrimonial Property, Maintenance, Illegitimacy of Child
Source Language
english
Family and Children Dissolution of Marriage Custody of Children Matrimonial Property Maintenance Illegitimacy of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FAJ

Applicant

SJH

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Matrimonial Cause / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to provide maintenance and used abusive language against the petitioner.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent denied paternity of one of the children.
  3. 3 Determination of ownership of the plot and house acquired during the marriage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down due to the petitioner’s admitted adultery and abandonment of the matrimonial home and children. The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence for her claims regarding maintenance, abuse, and ownership of property. The court held that the respondent was entitled to custody of the minor children, as the petitioner had abandoned them and was not best placed to care for them. The property in question was deemed matrimonial property, but the respondent was granted continued occupation and management due to his role in caring for the children. The petitioner was denied maintenance and property ownership but retained rights...

Court Disposition

Marriage dissolved; custody of minor children awarded to respondent; petitioner denied maintenance and property ownership; petitioner entitled to personal effects and access to children.

Orders

  • The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved.
  • Custody of the minor children is awarded to the respondent; the petitioner has right of access.