[2021] KEHC 7510 (KLR)
The court found that the predominant issues in the suit relate to the use and occupation of the suit premises, specifically LR. No.8839/53. Under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act, jurisdiction over such matters is exclusively vested in the Environment and Land Court. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 7510 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Family Bank Limited; Defendant: Nancy Chepkemoi Cheruiyot
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 4 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection allowed; suit transferred to the Environment and Land Court; costs awarded to Defendant.
- Judges
- AN Ongeri
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objection, Use and Occupation of Land, Transfer of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Family Bank Limited
Plaintiff
Nancy Chepkemoi Cheruiyot
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit relating to use and occupation of LR. No.8839/53.
- 2 Whether the suit should be struck out or transferred to the Environment and Land Court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the predominant issues in the suit relate to the use and occupation of the suit premises, specifically LR. No.8839/53. Under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act, jurisdiction over such matters is exclusively vested in the Environment and Land Court. The High Court therefore lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit. Rather than striking out the suit, the court exercised its discretion to transfer the matter to the Environment and Land Court for hearing and determination. The Plaintiff was ordered to pay the Defendant's costs of the preliminary objection.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection allowed; suit transferred to the Environment and Land Court; costs awarded to Defendant.
Orders
- The suit is transferred to the Environment and Land Court with immediate effect for hearing and determination.
- The Plaintiff will pay the Defendant's costs of the Preliminary Objection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERICHO
CIVIL CASE NO. 4 OF 2020
FAMILY BANK LIMITED................................................PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
NANCY CHEPKEMOI CHERUIYOT.........................DEFENDANT
R U L I N G
1. The Defendant filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection (NOPO) to the Plaintiff’s Application dated 2/3/2020 and the entire suit on the following grounds:-
(i) THAT the Plaintiff’s Application and entire suit is devoid of Jurisdiction as the Court empowered to hear this case in the Environment and Land Court (ELC) established under Order Article 162 (2) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya as read with the Environment and Land Court Act No.19 of 2011.
(ii) THAT the relief sought relate to the use and occupation of 3000 square feet and the development on LR.No.8839/53 located in Litein Trading Centre (hereafter referred to as the suit property).
(iii) THAT the Court should strike out this suit in it’s entirety.
2. The parties filed written submissions which I have duly considered. The issue for determination is whether or not this court is seized of the Jurisdiction to hear this suit.
3. The Defendant submitted that the case relates to use and occupation of LR. No.8839/53 located at Litein Trading Centre. (The suit Property).
4. Opposing the Notice of Preliminary Objection, the Plaintiff submitted that a Preliminary Objection must be based on pure points of law which when argued will dispose of the matter and further that this Court has Jurisdiction to determine this suit which is seeking Kshs.28,492,757 being the sum of money the Plaintiff incurred in construction of banking premises on the suit property and therefore the purpose of the suit is to seek to recover the money.
5. The Plaintiff further submitted that the case has nothing to do with the occupation of the suit property and further that should the court find that the predominant issues raised fall within the ELC Court, the Court has Jurisdiction to transfer the case to the ELC Court.
6. I have perused the Plaint filed herein by the Plaintiff where the Plaintiff is seeking the Following Orders.
(i) The sum of Kenya Shillings Twenty Eight Million Four Hundred and Ninety Two Thousand, Seven Hundred and Fifty Seven (Kshs.28,492,767) being the sum of money incurred by the Plaintiff in construction of banking premises on the suit property.
(ii) A declaration that the Defendant is by her conduct estopped from claiming vacant possession of that portion of property marked. A measuring 3000 square feet being proposed subdivision plan over the suit property.
(iii) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from evicting or in any way interfering with the Plaintiff’s quiet possession of that portion of property marked A measuring 3000 square feet being proposed subdivision plan over the suit property until such time as the Plaintiff recovers the cost of constructing the banking premises.
7. I find that the issues for determination relate to use and occupation of the suit premises and the Court which has Jurisdiction to hear this suit is the ELC Court.
8. I allow the preliminary Objection and direct that this suit be and is hereby transferred to the ELC Court with immediate effect for hearing and determination.
9. The Plaintiff will pay the Defendant’s costs of the Preliminary Objection.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT KERICHO THIS 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021.
A. N. ONGERI
JUDGE