[2023] KEMC 226 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds for divorce as set out in the Marriage Act, 2014, specifically irretrievable breakdown and financial cruelty. The court noted the absence of any intention by either party to salvage the marriage and the length of physical separation. Relying on...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEMC 226 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: FAO; Respondent: BAG
- Court
- Magistrate's Court
- Court Station
- Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause E488 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- JP Aduke
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Irretrievable Breakdown, Financial Cruelty, Christian Marriage, Uncontested Divorce
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FAO
Applicant
BAG
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the parties has irretrievably broken down under the Marriage Act, 2014.
- 2 Whether the petitioner has established grounds for divorce, specifically financial cruelty and irretrievable breakdown.
- 3 Whether the court should grant a decree of dissolution of marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds for divorce as set out in the Marriage Act, 2014, specifically irretrievable breakdown and financial cruelty. The court noted the absence of any intention by either party to salvage the marriage and the length of physical separation. Relying on statutory provisions and relevant case law, the court held that it cannot compel parties to remain in a marriage where one party has categorically stated their desire for dissolution. The petition was allowed, and the marriage was dissolved.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between the parties is hereby dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue, to be made absolute in 30 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
FAO v BAG (Divorce Cause E488 of 2023) [2023] KEMC 226 (KLR) (9 August 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEMC 226 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Milimani Commercial Chief Magistrate's Courts
Divorce Cause E488 of 2023
JP Aduke, SRM
August 9, 2023
Between
FAO
Petitioner
and
BAG
Respondent
Judgment
1. The Petitioner filed the petition dated 25th April 2022 seeking a divorce on the grounds of financial cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. Return of service on record shows that the respondent was served with the petition and annexures thereto. The respondent neither entered appearance nor filed a response. The petitioner filed an application seeking to have the petition proceed undefended. Return of service on record shows the petitioner served the respondent with the said application. These proceedings proceeded undefended.
2. The brief facts of the case are as contained in the petition on record. In summary, FAO and BAG solemnized their marriage on 10th September 2011in Church in Kenya. They have four issues together from the union. Both the Petitioner and respondent are domiciled in Kenya. The parties have no intentions of salvaging this marriage. The particulars of the grounds for divorce are outlined in the petition as follows:1. Irretrievable breakdown of the marriage;2. Financial Cruelty;
3At the hearing thereof, the petitioner relied on the petition and verifying affidavit on record as evidence in support of the petition for divorce. Notably, the petitioner averred that the contents of the petition remained true as at the date of the hearing. She prayed for an order of dissolution of the marriage.
4. The issue for determination before this court is whether or not the marriage between the parties merits an order of divorce under The Marriage Act, 2014 (hereafter, the Act).
5. The applicable law is s.65 of the Act (on dissolution of Christian marriages) which provides that the court may grant separation or divorce on the following grounds:1. adultery by the other spouse;2. cruelty by the other spouse;3. exceptional depravity by the other spouse;4. desertion by the other spouse for at least 3 years;5. the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
6. I have considered the particulars of the grounds outlined in the petition and how those have contributed to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as contemplated under s.65 of the Act. I have also noted the length of physical separation of the couple herein and relied on the reasoning of the court in JSM vs ENB[2015]. With respect to intention to salvage the union, I have noted the unequivocal terms of para 6 of the Petition on lack of such intention. The reasoning of the court in ROK v MJB [2017] eKLR and TPH v NVS [2017] eklr cannot be emphasized enough-“marriage is a voluntary union……this court cannot by any means order or compel the parties to remain married when the petitioner has categorically stated that she wants the same dissolved…”
7. Seeing as this court cannot force two adults to live together when there is no more love between them, I allow the petition dated 25th April 2022 before me on the following terms:1. the marriage between the two be and is hereby dissolved.2. Decree nisi do issue to be made absolute in 30 days.3. This being a family matter, each party to bear own costs.
ADUKE JEAL PRAXADES ATIENOSENIOR RESIDENT MAGISTRATEJUDGEMENT DATED AND SIGNED THIS 09TH AUGUST 2023. In the presence of:In the presence of:1. Court Assistant: Benjamin Kombe2. Counsel for the Petitioner- N/A3. Counsel for the Respondent: N/A