[2009] KEHC 244 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants' apprehension of bias was genuine and based on credible reasons, as the magistrate in Garsen was known to socialize with the police officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of the applicants. The absence of any rebuttal from the State reinforced the legitimacy of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 244 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Farah Ibrahim; Applicant: Abdi Salah Laban; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Appeal 70 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Criminal Case
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- DO Ohungo
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Criminal Proceedings, Judicial Bias, Fair Trial Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farah Ibrahim
Applicant
Abdi Salah Laban
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Criminal Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are likely to be denied a fair and impartial trial before the Garsen Court due to alleged bias.
- 2 Whether the criminal case should be transferred to another court to ensure justice is seen to be done.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' apprehension of bias was genuine and based on credible reasons, as the magistrate in Garsen was known to socialize with the police officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of the applicants. The absence of any rebuttal from the State reinforced the legitimacy of the applicants' concerns. The court held that, in such circumstances, the likelihood of partiality was real and justice required not only to be done but to be seen to be done. Consequently, the court ordered the transfer of the criminal case from the Garsen Court to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Malindi to ensure an impartial hearing and determination.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The criminal case file no. 159 of 2009 pending before the Resident Magistrate Garsen is transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Malindi for hearing and determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MALINDI
Miscellaneous Criminal Appeal 70 of 2009
FARAH IBRAHIMABDI SALAH LABAN ……...…………………..APPLICANTS
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………….............……...............................…………RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
Farah Ibrahim and Abdi Salah Laban (the applicants) have made this application by way of Notice of Motion dated 17th November 2009 seeking that criminal case no. 159 of 2009 which is pending before the Resident magistrate Garsen be transferred to any other court of equal or superior jurisdiction, away from the location. It is based on ground that:
(1)The circumstances surrounding the case are such that applicants cannot have a fair and impartial trial before the Garsen Court.
(2)Justice should not only be done but must be seen to be done.
The same is supported by an affidavit sworn by the first applicant who says that on 20-10-09, he was shot by police while on his way home from the shamba where he had been planting maize, and woke up at Garsen Hospital at about 9. 30pm. The police then removed him from the hospital and took him to Malindi police station. Then the second applicant who had been left to take care of him in the hospital at night was also pushed into the police motor vehicle and charged along with first applicant.
He was then hurriedly charged with a series of offenses in Garsen. Applicants’ concern is that the officer who shot him and his colleagues who investigated the matter are all based and serving in Garsen. There is only one magistrate in Garsen and he is known to socialize with the police officers concerned, so applicants are apprehensive that they are likely to be prejudiced and denied justice. The officers in the matter are Pc Joseph Dokta Mongot Pc No. 9197 and No. 93243 Pc Sammy Mwendwa and the magistrate is named as Justus Kituku.
There is no reply to these allegations and Mr. Naulikha who appeared on behalf of the State, indicated he had no objection to the application. What is alleged is a real likelihood of bias and it is not denied that the magistrate under whose jurisdiction this matter falls, socializes with the named police officers. In that case then applicant’s apprehensions are genuine and based on good reasons that there may not be impartiality in the matters.
Indeed justice must no only be done but be seen o be done. The application has merit and I direct that the said file be transferred to Chief Magistrate’s Court at Malindi for hearing and determination.
Dated this 15th day of December 2009 at Malindi.
H. A. Omondi
JUDGE