[2016] KEHC 8035 (KLR)
The court found that the Applicant deliberately used another person's passport and failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for not securing his own travel documents. Given the prevailing security concerns in Kenya, offences involving fraudulent use of travel documents cannot be treated lightly. The Applicant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 8035 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Farah Mohamed Kassim alias Hassan Hilowe Yalahow; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision 134 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Use of False Passport, Immigration Offences, Sentencing Revision
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farah Mohamed Kassim alias Hassan Hilowe Yalahow
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the Applicant for using a passport issued to another person should be revised.
- 2 Whether the Applicant's personal circumstances and remorse justify a reduction or alteration of the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Applicant deliberately used another person's passport and failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for not securing his own travel documents. Given the prevailing security concerns in Kenya, offences involving fraudulent use of travel documents cannot be treated lightly. The Applicant had only served about two weeks of the twelve-month sentence, which the court found insufficient to meet the objectives of punishment and deterrence. The court was not persuaded that the Applicant's personal circumstances or remorse warranted interference with the sentence imposed by the trial court. Accordingly, the application for revision was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for revision of sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 134 OF 2016
FARAH MOHAMED KASSIMALIAS
HASSAN HILOWE YALAHOW…………………………………APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………….RESPONDENT
RULING
The application herein is for revision of sentence imposed on the Applicant. He was charged with the offence of knowingly using a passport issued to another person contrary to Section 54(1)(M) as read with Section 54(2) of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act, 2011. It was alleged that on the 13th day of June, 2016 at Wajir Airport within Wajir County, being a Somalia national, was found using a South African passport number T00029410 issued to one Hassan Hilowle Yalahow while arriving in Kenya from Mogadishu, Somalia aboard Juba Airways Flight Number 3Y0714 using the said passport.
The Applicant was convicted on his own plea of guilty. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Ksh. 200,000/ in default serve 12 months imprisonment. The plea was taken on 15th June, 2016. His plea to this court is that he was arrested as he travelled to Mozambique to look for greener pastures. He also cannot afford the fine. Further that he lost his both parents during the civil war in Somalia. He states that he is remorseful and urges that court to release him.
I have accordingly considered the application. From the facts of the case, it clear that the Applicant deliberately used someone else’ passport for reasons best known to himself. It is not clear why he could not secure his own passport that would have enabled him to travel to his destination. This being an era when Kenya is under threat of terrorism the offence cannot be taken lightly. More so because the Applicant was convicted on 15th June, 2016 and has therefore only served about two weeks out of the 12 months jail term imposed. He has not yet sufficiently felt the burden of serving the punishment for his mistakes. I am accordingly disinclined to allow the application.
In the end, the application is dismissed.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 6th Day of July, 2016
G.W.NGENYE-MACHARIA
JUDGE
In the presence of;
1. Applicant in person.
2. Miss Sigei for the Respondent.