[2013] KEHC 6218 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6218 (KLR)

The court held that it could not interfere with the merits of the Committee's decision as there was no evidence to support the applicant's claim that the substitution was irregular or that Amina Tiffow was not a URP member. Furthermore, the court found that the failure to join Amina Tiffow, whose nomination was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6218 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fatuma Adan Kala; Respondent: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: United Republican Party
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 235 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Party List Nomination, Right to Fair Administrative Action, Non Joinder of Parties
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Election Petitions Party List Nomination Right to Fair Administrative Action Non Joinder of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fatuma Adan Kala

Applicant

The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

United Republican Party

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the substitution of the applicant's name on the party list was irregular and in breach of constitutional rights.
  2. 2 Whether the Committee's decision was reviewable by the court in the circumstances.
  3. 3 Whether the non-joinder of the nominee whose name was substituted was fatal to the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it could not interfere with the merits of the Committee's decision as there was no evidence to support the applicant's claim that the substitution was irregular or that Amina Tiffow was not a URP member. Furthermore, the court found that the failure to join Amina Tiffow, whose nomination was directly challenged, was a fatal procedural defect. As such, the application was dismissed for lack of merit and for non-joinder of a necessary party.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed.
  • There is no order as to costs.