[2018] KEELC 1754 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 1754 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had been in continuous, open, and uninterrupted possession of the suit land for over 40 years, satisfying the requirements for adverse possession under Kenyan law. The applicant's occupation was without force, secrecy, or permission, and the defendant, as the registered proprietor,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 1754 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Fatuma Mashaka; Defendant: Batulbai w/o Badrudin Mulla Adamji Anjari
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 62 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the plaintiff
Judges
LC Komingoi, AA Omollo
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Title Registration, Limitation of Actions, Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Title Registration Limitation of Actions Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fatuma Mashaka

Plaintiff

Batulbai w/o Badrudin Mulla Adamji Anjari

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to be declared as proprietor of Plot No. 227/Section V/Mainland North by way of adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to be registered as the owner of the suit property.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had been in continuous, open, and uninterrupted possession of the suit land for over 40 years, satisfying the requirements for adverse possession under Kenyan law. The applicant's occupation was without force, secrecy, or permission, and the defendant, as the registered proprietor, failed to interrupt or challenge this possession for the statutory period. The evidence, including title documents, receipts, and official search, corroborated the applicant's claim. The court held that the applicant had acquired title by adverse possession, extinguishing the defendant's ownership rights, and was entitled to be registered as proprietor of the suit land. The...

Court Disposition

judgment for the plaintiff

Orders

  • A declaration is issued that the plaintiff/applicant is entitled by way of adverse possession to be registered as the owner of Plot Number 227/Section V/Mainland North situated in Jomvu.
  • The ownership rights of Batulbai w/o Bandrudin Mulla Adamji Anjari are extinguished by virtue of the accrued right of adverse possession by the plaintiff/applicant.