[2017] KEELC 3742 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3742 (KLR)

The court found that the 2nd and 3rd defendants had failed to comply with pre-trial directions despite being granted a final opportunity and having ample time since February 2016. No plausible reason was advanced for the continued non-compliance. The court, invoking its discretion under the Civil Procedure Act and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3742 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Fatuma Mohamed Ali; Defendant: Boru Dika; Defendant: Henry Kimathi; Defendant: Festus Nyaga Kamberia
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 25 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Compliance With Pre Trial Directions (order 11)
Outcome
Application for extension of time for compliance by 2nd and 3rd defendants declined.
Judges
LN Mbugua
Legal Topics
Pre Trial Compliance, Case Management, Directions Order, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Pre Trial Compliance Case Management Directions Order Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fatuma Mohamed Ali

Plaintiff

Boru Dika

Defendant

Henry Kimathi

Defendant

Festus Nyaga Kamberia

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Compliance With Pre Trial Directions (order 11)

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd and 3rd defendants have provided sufficient reason for non-compliance with pre-trial directions.
  2. 2 Whether the court should grant a further extension of time for compliance to the 2nd and 3rd defendants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the 2nd and 3rd defendants had failed to comply with pre-trial directions despite being granted a final opportunity and having ample time since February 2016. No plausible reason was advanced for the continued non-compliance. The court, invoking its discretion under the Civil Procedure Act and the Constitution, declined to grant any further extension of time for compliance. The court emphasized that orders granting final chances must not be rendered meaningless by repeated indulgence. Consequently, the court directed that the matter proceed without further delay, and would issue directions on the further conduct of the case.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time for compliance by 2nd and 3rd defendants declined.

Orders

  • No further extension of time for compliance is granted to the 2nd and 3rd defendants.
  • The court will proceed to give directions on how the case will proceed.