[2017] KEHC 6402 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6402 (KLR)

The court found the application merited after considering the affidavits and submissions from both parties. The judge exercised discretion to grant a stay of execution, leave to file an appeal out of time, and deemed the draft memorandum of appeal as properly filed and served. The court refrained from detailed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 6402 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fatuma Nuru Mukoro; Respondent: Amina Abdi Lama
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Marsabit
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 17 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed in terms of prayers 1, 2, and 3. Each party to bear own costs.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Civil Application Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Leave to Appeal Out of Time Civil Application Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fatuma Nuru Mukoro

Applicant

Amina Abdi Lama

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment and decree in Kadhi's case number 90 of 2015 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.
  3. 3 Whether the draft memorandum of appeal should be deemed as properly filed and served.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the application merited after considering the affidavits and submissions from both parties. The judge exercised discretion to grant a stay of execution, leave to file an appeal out of time, and deemed the draft memorandum of appeal as properly filed and served. The court refrained from detailed reasoning to avoid prejudicing the substantive appeal, as it would be heard before the same judge. Each party was ordered to bear their own costs for the application.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in terms of prayers 1, 2, and 3. Each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the judgment and decree and all consequential orders in Kadhi's case number 90 of 2015 pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
  • Applicant granted leave to file an appeal out of time.