[2017] KEELC 3847 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3847 (KLR)

The court found that since the application to abandon the Notice of Motion had not been served on the respondents, there would be no prejudice to them. The abandonment of the application was consistent with the constitutional imperative for expeditious disposal of cases. The court also noted the current jurisdiction...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3847 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Felix Akowa Rabongo; Defendant: Peter Nyanengo; Defendant: Migori County Government
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 28 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Abandon Notice of Motion
Outcome
Application allowed; Notice of Motion dated 11/4/2017 marked as abandoned with no orders as to costs.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Magistrates Courts, Abandonment of Application
Source Language
en
Land and Property Transfer of Suit Jurisdiction of Magistrates Courts Abandonment of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Felix Akowa Rabongo

Plaintiff

Peter Nyanengo

Defendant

Migori County Government

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Abandon Notice of Motion

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Motion application dated 11/4/2017 should be marked as abandoned.
  2. 2 Whether abandonment of the application prejudices the respondents who have not been served.
  3. 3 Whether the application aligns with the constitutional principle of expeditious disposal of cases.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the application to abandon the Notice of Motion had not been served on the respondents, there would be no prejudice to them. The abandonment of the application was consistent with the constitutional imperative for expeditious disposal of cases. The court also noted the current jurisdiction of Magistrates' courts to hear ELC matters, referencing relevant appellate authority. Accordingly, the application to mark the Notice of Motion as abandoned was allowed, with no orders as to costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; Notice of Motion dated 11/4/2017 marked as abandoned with no orders as to costs.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion application dated 11/4/2017 is marked as abandoned.
  • No orders as to costs.