[2020] KEHC 5161 (KLR)
The court found that although the sentence of 7 years' imprisonment was reasonable given the statutory maximum of 14 years for stealing stock, the appellant's positive conduct in prison, acquisition of skills, and evidence of reform justified a reduction of sentence. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 5161 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Felix Kipkoskei; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 13 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed_in_part
- Judges
- RB Ngetich
- Legal Topics
- Stealing Stock, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation, First Offender, Appeal on Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Felix Kipkoskei
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant for the offence of stealing stock was excessive and should be reduced.
- 2 Whether the appellant's mitigation and evidence of reform warranted a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the sentence of 7 years' imprisonment was reasonable given the statutory maximum of 14 years for stealing stock, the appellant's positive conduct in prison, acquisition of skills, and evidence of reform justified a reduction of sentence. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to 5 years, considering the appellant's mitigation and the period already served.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed_in_part
Orders
- Conviction by trial court is upheld.
- Appeal on sentence is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.13 OF 2019
FELIX KIPKOSKEI...................................APPELLANT
-VERSUS-
REPUBLIC...............................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
BACKGROUND
1. The Appellant herein was charged in the lower court with the offence of Stealing Stock Contrary to Section 278 of the Penal Code. Particulars are that on the 28th day of February 2017 in Ole-Rongai area in Rongai Sub-County within Nakuru County, appellant jointly with others who were before court stole 12(twelve heads of cattle) valued at kshs.40,000 the property of Mrs. Jemutai Bartogony.
2. The accused persons were also charged with an alternative count of handling stolen property contrary to Section 322(1) (2) of the Penal Code. Particulars are that on the 28th day of February 2017 in Ole-Rongai area in Rongai Sub-County within Nakuru County otherwise than in the course of stealing, accused persons dishonestly retained 12 heads of cattle knowing or having reason to believe them to be stolen property unlawfully obtained.
3. The appellant pleaded not guilty to both the main charge and alternative count. The case proceeded for hearing with prosecution calling 6 witnesses. The appellant herein chose to adduce sworn defence with no witness to call. The appellant was convicted jointly with one of the co-accused persons while Accused 3 who the court noted that he orchestrated the whole offence was acquitted for lack of evidence under Section 215 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant and accused 1 were sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment. The appellant indicated to the Court that he is satisfied with the conviction and he only wished to pursue appeal on sentence.
ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION
4. I note from the record that the appellant indicated that he was a first offender. In his mitigation before this Court, he said he has learnt a lot in prison; that he has reformed and showed Court certificates of training. He said he has been trained as a painter with Grade 3 and 2 certificates. Also availed to Court recommendation letter from prison; he also said he is a parent and wish to go back to his family and urged the Court to consider that and reduce his sentence.
5. I note that the offender convicted of stealing stock is liable to imprisonment for a period not exceeding 14 years. The appellant was sentenced to half the maximum period of imprisonment. He was sentenced on 23rd March, 2018 for 7 years meaning he has been in prison for 2 years now. In my view the sentence imposed was reasonable but in view of the fact that he has taken imprisonment positively and used the period in prison to put value to himself by taking advantage of training available to acquire skills to help him earn a living which is evidence by recommendation letter from prison and certificates filed, it is my considered view that he deserves reduction of sentence.
6. FINAL ORDERS
1. Conviction by trial court is upheld.
2. Appeal on sentence is allowed.
3. Sentence is reduced to 5 years’ imprisonment.
4. Sentence to run from the time of sentence by the trial court.
Judgment dated, signed and delivered via zoom at Nakuru This 11th day of June, 2020
......................................
RACHEL NGETICH
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Schola - Court Assistant
Appellant in person
Rita for State