[2017] KEHC 2762 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2762 (KLR)

The court found that the omission to expressly state the applicability of the agreed 80:20 liability ratio to the general damages in the final orders was an oversight. Since the parties had entered a binding consent on liability, and the court had already taken this into account in its judgment, it was necessary to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 2762 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Felix Kitavi Wambua; Respondent: Njagi Mwendwa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 33 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Interpretation of Judgment
Outcome
application allowed; judgment amended to clarify damages subject to 80:20 ratio
Judges
FN Muchemi
Legal Topics
Apportionment of Liability, Interpretation of Judgments, General Damages
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Tort Law Apportionment of Liability Interpretation of Judgments General Damages

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Felix Kitavi Wambua

Appellant

Njagi Mwendwa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Interpretation of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the agreed liability ratio of 80:20 applies to the general damages awarded to the cross-appellant.
  2. 2 Whether the omission to indicate the ratio in the final orders was an oversight that requires correction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the omission to expressly state the applicability of the agreed 80:20 liability ratio to the general damages in the final orders was an oversight. Since the parties had entered a binding consent on liability, and the court had already taken this into account in its judgment, it was necessary to amend the judgment to clarify that the general damages awarded were subject to the agreed ratio. The court exercised its power to correct the accidental omission to ensure the judgment accurately reflected the parties' agreement and the court's intention.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment amended to clarify damages subject to 80:20 ratio

Orders

  • Paragraph 19 of the judgment is amended to state that the sum of Kshs.1,850,000 is subject to the agreed ratio of 80:20.
  • The amount payable to the cross-appellant is Kshs.1,480,000.