[2007] KEHC 1002 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 1002 (KLR)

The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted without jurisdiction when it purported to determine ownership and order subdivision of registered land, as such matters are expressly excluded from its mandate under Section 3 of the Land Disputes Act. The Registered Land Act confers absolute title to the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 1002 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Felix Mathenge Murage; Respondent: The Chairman Land Dispute Tribunal; Respondent: Baricho Resident Magistrate Court; Respondent: Tabitha Ngonyo Kariuki
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 181 of 2005
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Certiorari
Outcome
Application allowed. Orders of certiorari granted as prayed.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal, Ownership of Registered Land, Judicial Review Certiorari
Source Language
en
Land and Property Administrative Law Jurisdiction of Land Disputes Tribunal Ownership of Registered Land Judicial Review Certiorari

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Felix Mathenge Murage

Applicant

The Chairman Land Dispute Tribunal

Respondent

Baricho Resident Magistrate Court

Respondent

Tabitha Ngonyo Kariuki

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Certiorari

  1. 1 Whether the Land Disputes Tribunal had jurisdiction to determine ownership of registered land.
  2. 2 Whether the award and subsequent judgment based on the Tribunal's decision were nullities.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Land Disputes Tribunal acted without jurisdiction when it purported to determine ownership and order subdivision of registered land, as such matters are expressly excluded from its mandate under Section 3 of the Land Disputes Act. The Registered Land Act confers absolute title to the registered owner, and only courts with proper jurisdiction may adjudicate disputes over such title. Consequently, the Tribunal's award was a nullity, and the Resident Magistrate's Court erred in adopting and entering judgment on a void decision. The application for certiorari was therefore allowed, and the impugned award and judgment were quashed.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Orders of certiorari granted as prayed.

Orders

  • The award made on 5/8/2005 by Ndia Land Disputes Tribunal is quashed.
  • The judgment and decree adopted by Baricho Resident Magistrate’s Court Land Dispute Tribunal No. 14/2005 are quashed.