[2015] KEHC 7085 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's summons for revocation and/or annulment of grant were incompetent because the previous application and citation had been withdrawn and the applicant was directed to pursue her claim in a different succession cause file (P & A No. 1245 of 2013). Furthermore, the summons were not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 7085 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Filomena Kinanu; Respondent: Ann Wanjiru Muriithi; Respondent: Sandra Njeri Muriithi
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1927 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Summons for Revocation/annulment of Grant
- Outcome
- Summons for revocation and/or annulment struck out; leave granted to file in correct succession cause; prior proceedings set aside.
- Judges
- AO Muchelule
- Legal Topics
- Succession Proceedings, Revocation of Grant, Service of Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Filomena Kinanu
Applicant
Ann Wanjiru Muriithi
Respondent
Sandra Njeri Muriithi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Summons for Revocation/annulment of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the summons for revocation and/or annulment of grant were properly before the court given prior withdrawal orders.
- 2 Whether the respondents were properly served with the summons for revocation and/or annulment.
- 3 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to pursue her claim in the correct succession cause file.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's summons for revocation and/or annulment of grant were incompetent because the previous application and citation had been withdrawn and the applicant was directed to pursue her claim in a different succession cause file (P & A No. 1245 of 2013). Furthermore, the summons were not properly served on the respondents, as required by law, since representation by their previous advocates had ended with the withdrawal of the earlier application. The court concluded that the current file ought to have been closed and that the applicant should file her application in the correct file. The proceedings of 11th February 2015 were set aside, and the summons were...
Court Disposition
Summons for revocation and/or annulment struck out; leave granted to file in correct succession cause; prior proceedings set aside.
Orders
- The citation and application for grant of letters of administration ad litem were withdrawn on 29th January 2014 and the applicant directed to pursue her claim in P & A No. 1245 of 2013; those orders remain in place.
- The summons for revocation and/or annulment filed herein are incompetent and the file ought to have been closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1927 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES MURIITHI GITHUA (DECEASED)
FILOMENA KINANU..................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
ANN WANJIRU MURIITHI...............................1ST RESPONDENT
SANDRA NJERI MURIITHI.............................2ND RESPONDENT
ORDER
The applicant filed this summons for the revocation and/or annulment of the grant that was issued to ANN WANJIRU MURIITHI and SANDRA NJERI MURIITHI ( the respondents) on 6th August 2013 in respect of the estate of the deceased JAMES MURIITHI GITHUA who died intestate on 10th April 2013. The respondents are the widow and daughter, respectively, of the deceased. The basis of the application was that the applicant was the second widow of the deceased (with whom they had two children) and yet she had not been informed of, and involved in, the Succession proceedings leading to the grant. On the basis that she served the summons and got no response, she was allowed to testify and call witnesses to support the case. The witnesses were the brother and sister of the deceased who said that they knew the deceased to have this second family.
I have perused this file and noted that the applicant first came to this Court on 2nd August 2013 for grant of letters of administration and ad litemfor the purposes of enabling her to file a case for damages following the death of the deceased in a road accident. In the file was also a citation to 1st respondent. On 29th January 2014 her advocate MRS. MORARA went before Justice Kimaru on the application and citation. Counsel then informed Court that she had since learnt that the respondents had successfully petitioned for a grant in High Court P & A No. 1245 of 2013 at Nairobi. An order was made withdrawing the applications and the applicant advised to pursue her claim in P & A No. 1245 of 2013. Quite unfortunately, the applicant brought the instant application in this file.
I have called for and perused the file in P & A No. 1245 of 2013. The petition was filed on 13th May 2013, grant issued on 6th August 2013, confirmed on 27th May 2014 and certificate issued on same day. Of importance, the advocates acting for the respondents were GICHUKI KING’ARA & Co. Advocates. The instance summons was served on OKINDO OGUTU & CO. Advocates who had entered appearance on 11th November 2013 on the citation. It is clear that once the application and citation were withdrawn that ended the representation on behalf of the respondents. It follows that the summons ought to have been served personally on the respondents. That was not done.
It is because of the foregoing that I make the following orders:-
the citation and application for grant of letters of administration ad litem were ordered withdrawn on 29th January 2014 and the applicant directed to pursue her claim in P & A No. 1245 of 2013, and those orders are still in place;
the summons for revocation and/or annulment that were filed herein are consequently incompetent, as the file ought to have been closed;
in any case, the summons were not served on the respondents;
the summons are hereby struck out, but, because this is a family dispute, there is leave for the applicant to file the application in P & A 1245 of 2013; and
the proceedings of 11th February 2015 are hereby set aside.
DATED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 13th February 2015.
A.O. MUCHELULE
JUDGE