[2020] KEHC 3327 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 3327 (KLR)

The court found that the application demonstrated sufficient urgency to warrant being heard during the recess and accordingly granted leave. The application for stay of proceedings was certified as urgent, but the court directed that the respondents be served and the matter be heard interpartes before the Presiding...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 3327 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: First Assurance Co. Ltd; Respondent: Osienala (Friends of Lake Victoria); Respondent: SBM Bank (K) Ltd
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 55 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave and Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
Application for leave to be heard during recess granted; application for stay of proceedings certified urgent and referred for interpartes hearing.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Leave to Be Heard During Recess, Urgent Applications
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Leave to Be Heard During Recess Urgent Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

First Assurance Co. Ltd

Appellant

Osienala (Friends of Lake Victoria)

Respondent

SBM Bank (K) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave and Stay of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted for the application to be heard during the court recess.
  2. 2 Whether the application for stay of proceedings should be certified as urgent and directions given for interpartes hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application demonstrated sufficient urgency to warrant being heard during the recess and accordingly granted leave. The application for stay of proceedings was certified as urgent, but the court directed that the respondents be served and the matter be heard interpartes before the Presiding or Duty Judge at Kisumu High Court. The matter was referred back to Kisumu High Court for final determination, ensuring that both parties would have an opportunity to be heard on the substantive application.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to be heard during recess granted; application for stay of proceedings certified urgent and referred for interpartes hearing.

Orders

  • Leave granted for application to be heard during recess.
  • Application for stay of proceedings certified as urgent.