[2020] KEHC 1227 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 1227 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had complied with the procedural requirements for a change of advocates after judgment, including seeking leave of court and effecting proper service of the application and hearing notice on the previous advocates and the respondents. As there was no opposition to the application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 1227 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: First Community Bank Limited; Defendant: Samiras Development Co. Ltd; Defendant: Suleiman Mohamed Ali; Defendant: Mohamed Issack Noor; Defendant: Mahadi Energy Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case CaseE065 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Change Advocates Post Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Change of Advocates, Leave of Court Post Judgment, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Change of Advocates Leave of Court Post Judgment Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

First Community Bank Limited

Plaintiff

Samiras Development Co. Ltd

Defendant

Suleiman Mohamed Ali

Defendant

Mohamed Issack Noor

Defendant

Mahadi Energy Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Change Advocates Post Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the firm of Issa & Company Advocates should be granted leave to come on record for the plaintiff in place of Kenyariri & Associates Advocates after judgment has been entered.
  2. 2 Whether proper service of the application and hearing notice was effected on the relevant parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had complied with the procedural requirements for a change of advocates after judgment, including seeking leave of court and effecting proper service of the application and hearing notice on the previous advocates and the respondents. As there was no opposition to the application and the requirements of Order 9 Rule 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules had been satisfied, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave for Issa & Company Advocates to come on record for the plaintiff in place of Kenyariri & Associates Advocates. The court further directed that the ruling would apply to related matters pending before it.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Leave is granted for the firm of Issa & Company Advocates to come on record for the plaintiff in place of Kenyariri & Associates Advocates.
  • The ruling shall apply to related matters HCCOM. E69 and E70 of 2019.