[2018] KEELRC 2463 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 2463 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's employment was governed by a fixed term contract which expired on 8th July 2015. The claimant was given a 30-day notice of termination as required by the contract, and there was no evidence that she expected renewal or that the refusal to renew constituted unfair termination. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 2463 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Florence Wambui; Respondent: Mary Immaculate Cottage Hospital a.k.a Sisters of Mary Immaculate
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 610 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed.
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Fixed Term Contracts, Underpayment of Wages, Notice of Termination
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Fixed Term Contracts Underpayment of Wages Notice of Termination

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Florence Wambui

Claimant

Mary Immaculate Cottage Hospital a.k.a Sisters of Mary Immaculate

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unfair or unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to salary in lieu of notice, annual leave pay, underpayment of salary, and compensation for unfair termination.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was underpaid in violation of the applicable wage orders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's employment was governed by a fixed term contract which expired on 8th July 2015. The claimant was given a 30-day notice of termination as required by the contract, and there was no evidence that she expected renewal or that the refusal to renew constituted unfair termination. The allegations of gross misconduct did not result in summary dismissal, and most were addressed through warnings and apologies. The court held that termination was based on permissible grounds under the contract and was therefore fair and lawful. However, the court found that the claimant was underpaid in violation of the applicable wage orders, as she was paid less than the...

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed.

Orders

  • Termination was lawful.
  • Respondent to pay claimant underpayment of salary at Kshs. 47,922.