[2019] KEELC 2635 (KLR)
The court found that while it had erred in stating that no replying affidavit had been filed by the 2nd plaintiff, the affidavit that was filed merely raised technical issues and did not provide substantive evidence to rebut the allegations of contempt. In particular, there was no evidence presented to support the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 2635 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Florentina Kimoi Kimutai; Plaintiff: Joel Kiprotich Kimutai; Defendant: Francis Chuma
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 385 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Ruling on Application to Review Contempt Finding
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- A Ombwayo
- Legal Topics
- Review of Court Orders, Contempt of Court, Replying Affidavit, Error on Face of Record
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Florentina Kimoi Kimutai
Plaintiff
Joel Kiprotich Kimutai
Plaintiff
Francis Chuma
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application to Review Contempt Finding
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an error apparent on the face of the record regarding the existence of a replying affidavit by the 2nd plaintiff.
- 2 Whether sufficient grounds exist to review or set aside the contempt finding against the 2nd plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while it had erred in stating that no replying affidavit had been filed by the 2nd plaintiff, the affidavit that was filed merely raised technical issues and did not provide substantive evidence to rebut the allegations of contempt. In particular, there was no evidence presented to support the 2nd plaintiff's claim that he was on duty at Moi Air Base at the material time. As a result, the court held that there were no sufficient grounds to review or set aside the contempt finding. The application for review was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET
E & L CASE NO. 385 OF 2013
FLORENTINA KIMOI KIMUTAI........................1ST PLAINTIFF
JOEL KIPROTICH KIMUTAI.............................2ND PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
FRANCIS CHUMA....................................................DEFENDANT
RULING
The applicant prays that the honourable court be pleased to review, vary and/or set aside its order made on the 17th January, 2019 in so far as it found the 2nd plaintiff guilty of contempt of court pursuant to the defendant’s motion dated the 7th April, 2015 and in so far as it found that no replying affidavit had been filed to the said application thus the allegations thereon were not controverted.
That the honourable court be pleased to consider the application dated the 7th April, 2015 together with the 2nd plaintiff’s replying affidavit filed on the 3rd October, 2017 and the parties’ submissions thereto and makes a determination thereof.
The application is based on grounds that there is an error apparent on the face of the records and that sufficient cause exists to warrant a review. That the application has been made without undue delay. That the 2nd plaintiff runs the peril of loss of liberty without a hearing.
Joel Kiprotich Kimutai states that the decision of the court in finding him guilty of contempt of court was motivated by the fact that a replying affidavit had not been seen by the court in respect of the application dated the 7th April, 2015 hence the allegations therein were not controverted as can be gleaned from page 4 lines 12-13 of the ruling.
That this was however an error apparent on the face of the record as on 3rd October, 2017, he did file in court a replying affidavit sworn on the 2nd October, 2017 in respect of the application dated the 7th April, 2015 and served the defendant’s advocates with the same on the 5th October, 2017 together with a list of authorities. That he did also file submissions on 21st May, 2018. That it is clear that it was an error to find that the motion was unopposed.
I do find that the court fell into error by finding that there was no replying affidavit as I have seen the replying affidavit. However, I have looked at the replying affidavit filed on 3. 10. 2017 sworn on 2. 10. 2017 by Joel Kiprotich Kimutai and do find that it merely raises technical issues. There is no evidence that Joel Kiprotich Kimutai was on duty at Moi Air Base in Nairobi County and therefore I do not find grounds to review the decision of the court. The application is otherwise dismissed with no order as to costs.
Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 27th day of June, 2019.
A. OMBWAYO
JUDGE