[2020] KEHC 1494 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 1494 (KLR)

The court found that both parties agreed the marriage was not consummated and that they had been separated for over nine years, with no realistic prospect of resuming cohabitation. The evidence established that the marriage had irretrievably broken down as defined under Section 66(6) of the Marriage Act, 2014. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 1494 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: FOJ; Respondent: NMK
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Divorce Cause 15 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Outcome
petition and cross-petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Judges
RB Ngetich
Legal Topics
Dissolution of Marriage, Irretrievable Breakdown, Non Consummation, Desertion, Marriage Act 2014
Source Language
en
Family and Children Dissolution of Marriage Irretrievable Breakdown Non Consummation Desertion Marriage Act 2014

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FOJ

Petitioner

NMK

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down under the Marriage Act, 2014.
  2. 2 Whether the lack of consummation and prolonged separation constitute sufficient grounds for dissolution of marriage.
  3. 3 Whether either party is entitled to costs or other reliefs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both parties agreed the marriage was not consummated and that they had been separated for over nine years, with no realistic prospect of resuming cohabitation. The evidence established that the marriage had irretrievably broken down as defined under Section 66(6) of the Marriage Act, 2014. The court held that two years’ separation or neglect is sufficient ground for divorce, and the prolonged absence of the petitioner from the matrimonial home, coupled with the lack of any attempt to live together, satisfied the statutory threshold for dissolution. The court therefore granted the dissolution of the marriage and ordered that each party bear their own costs.

Court Disposition

petition and cross-petition allowed; marriage dissolved

Orders

  • Marriage solemnized between the petitioner and the respondent on 20th July 2010 is hereby dissolved.
  • Decree Nisi to issue forthwith; to be made absolute after one month.