https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8446

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8446

The court found that the respondent had settled the principal arbitral award as communicated in counsel’s letter on the CTS, and on that basis the application was marked as settled with costs to the ex-parte applicant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 8446 (KLR)
Parties
Ex Parte Applicant: Foursons’ Holdings (K) Ltd; Defendant: County Government of Migori
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Commercial Miscellaneous Application E003 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Commercial Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Enforcement/stay and Setting Aside of Arbitral Award
Outcome
Application marked as settled
Judges
["ACA Ong’injo"]
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Arbitral Award, Stay of Proceedings, Setting Aside Arbitral Award, Settlement of Principal Award, Costs
Source Language
en
Commercial Law Arbitration Law Civil Procedure Enforcement of Arbitral Award Stay of Proceedings Setting Aside Arbitral Award Settlement of Principal Award Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Foursons’ Holdings (K) Ltd

Ex Parte Applicant

County Government of Migori

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Enforcement/stay and Setting Aside of Arbitral Award

  1. 1 Whether the proceedings should be stayed pending determination of the application to set aside the arbitral award
  2. 2 Whether the arbitral award should be set aside
  3. 3 Whether the matter had been settled by payment of the principal arbitral award

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had settled the principal arbitral award as communicated in counsel’s letter on the CTS, and on that basis the application was marked as settled with costs to the ex-parte applicant.

Court Disposition

Application marked as settled

Orders

  • Proceedings were marked as settled.
  • Costs awarded to the ex-parte applicant.