https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8821
The application met the threshold for joinder under Order 1 Rule 10(2), and because the pleadings had closed, the plaintiff also required leave to amend the plaint. The court therefore allowed the amendment and joinder of the additional parties.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 8821 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff: FR (Suing as the Legal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of MB - Minor); 2nd Plaintiff: FR; 1st Defendant: Coptic Hospital; 2nd Defendant: Dr Halim Hany; 3rd Defendant: Dr Mina Nady; 4th Defendant: Dr S.R Sakr; 5th Defendant: Dr Joseph Ndugire
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case E145 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint and Join Additional Defendants
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Judges
- ["Sifuna Nixon"]
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Leave of Court After Close of Pleadings, Costs in the Cause
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FR (Suing as the Legal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of MB - Minor)
1st Plaintiff
FR
2nd Plaintiff
Coptic Hospital
1st Defendant
Dr Halim Hany
2nd Defendant
Dr Mina Nady
3rd Defendant
Dr S.R Sakr
4th Defendant
Dr Joseph Ndugire
5th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Plaint and Join Additional Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend the plaint after pleadings had closed
- 2 Whether the proposed additional defendants were necessary for the court to effectually and completely adjudicate the suit
Ratio Decidendi
The application met the threshold for joinder under Order 1 Rule 10(2), and because the pleadings had closed, the plaintiff also required leave to amend the plaint. The court therefore allowed the amendment and joinder of the additional parties.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- Leave granted to amend the plaint and join the additional parties
- Amended plaint to be filed and served within 14 days from the date of the ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
FR (Suing as the Legal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of MB - Minor) & another v Coptic Hospital & 4 others (Civil Case E145 of 2024) [2026] KEHC 8821 (KLR) (Civ) (18 June 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 8821 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts) Civil Civil Case E145 of 2024 Sifuna Nixon, J June 18, 2026 Between FR(Suing as the Legal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of MB - Minor) 1st Plaintiff FR 2nd Plaintiff and Coptic Hospital 1st Defendant Dr Halim Hany 2nd Defendant Dr Mina Nady 3rd Defendant Dr S.R Sakr 4th Defendant Dr Joseph Ndugire 5th Defendant Ruling 1.This Ruling is on the Plaintiff’s Application dated 11th September 2025. By which she has sought to amend her Plaint. The sought amendment is to join more Defendants. 2.Amendment of pleadings is provided for in Order 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Order 8 Rule 3 provides that where pleadings have closed, the amendment shall be with leave of court. The Plaintiff is by this Application seeking such leave. 3.As regards joinder and substitution of parties, Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the said Rules, provides as follows:“The court may at any stage of the proceedings, either upon or without the application of either party, and on such terms as may appear to the court to be just, order that the name of any party improperly joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, be struck out, and that the name of any person who ought to have been joined, whether as plaintiff or defendant, or whose presence before the court may be necessary in order to enable the court effectually and completely adjudicate upon and settle all questions involved in the suit; be added.” 4.Upon considering the Application, together with its Supporting Affidavit, I find that the Application meets the legal threshold set in Order 1 Rule 10 (2). 5.The addition of the new parties to this suit requires that the Plaint be amended. Further, the pleadings having closed, any amendment to the pleadings, requires the leave of court. 6.For reasons aforegoing, this Application has merit, hence is hereby allowed. In terms that, the Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to amend the Plaint and join those parties. The Amended Plaint be filed and served within 14 days from the date of this ruling. 7.The Plaintiff shall have the costs of this Application. Which costs shall be in the cause. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI VIRTUALLY ON THIS 18TH OF JUNE 2026.PROF (DR) NIXON SIFUNAJUDGE