[2016] KEELRC 766 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's resignation was voluntary, as evidenced by his resignation letter and the lack of proof of coercion or permanent disability. The court held that, according to Regulation 38(2) of the Code of Regulations and Section 6 of the Pensions Act, voluntary resignation from government...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELRC 766 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Francis Bundi Kimathi; Respondent: National Security Intelligence Service
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1916 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Judges
- L Ndolo
- Legal Topics
- Pension Entitlement, Voluntary Resignation, Public Service Benefits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Bundi Kimathi
Claimant
National Security Intelligence Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to retirement benefits under the Pensions Act after voluntary resignation.
- 2 Whether the claimant's resignation was voluntary or due to illness amounting to permanent disability.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's resignation was voluntary, as evidenced by his resignation letter and the lack of proof of coercion or permanent disability. The court held that, according to Regulation 38(2) of the Code of Regulations and Section 6 of the Pensions Act, voluntary resignation from government service disqualifies an employee from claiming retirement benefits under the Pensions Act. The claimant's complaints about working conditions and alleged illness did not amount to coercion or permanent disability as contemplated by the law. Therefore, the claimant was not entitled to the pension benefits claimed.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- The claimant's claim for pension benefits under the Pensions Act is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
52 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO 1916 OF 2015
[FORMERLY MERU HCC NO 159 OF 2009]
FRANCIS BUNDI KIMATHI………………………………………CLAIMANT
VERSUS
NATIONAL SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE…...……RESPONDENT
AWARD
1. This matter was initially filed in the High Court at Meru in 2009 and was transferred to this Court in 2015 on the Claimant’s request.
2. The parties made several appearances before me during which the following was agreed upon:
a) That the Claimant would officially hand over and sign the Official Secrets Act Form, at the Respondent’s Headquarters;
b) That the Respondent would issue the Claimant with a clearance certificate;
c) That the parties would file submissions on the Claimant’s claim for pension under the Pensions Act upon which the Court would make a determination.
3. On its part, the Respondent maintains that since the Claimant had voluntarily resigned from service, he was not entitled to benefits under the Pensions Act.
4. In his submissions filed on 18th April 2016, the Claimant contents that his resignation from service was caused by illness and was therefore not voluntary. He blames the Respondent for failure to provide adequate medical cover, an allegation the Respondent denies.
5. The Claimant’s resignation notice dated 7th February 2005 states as follows:
“RE: NOTICE OF RESIGNATION FROM THE SERVICE (N.S.I.S)
I am the above named officer stationed at R.C’s Office NYANZA performing guard duties. I have been in the service for the last six years. Before then Iserved as an Administration Police constable from 8thAugust, 1995.
I hereby give a one month notice for resignation from the Service from the date of this letter.
Please organize to pay my dues as required.
Thanking you in advance, I remain,
Yours Obedient
(Signed)
BUNDI FRANCIS KIMATHI”
6. The Claimant’s resignation was accepted by the Respondent’s letter dated 12th April 2005 stating as follows:
“RESIGNATION
Reference is made to your letter dated 7thFebruary, 2005 tendering yourresignation from Service with effect from 7thMarch, 2005.
This is to inform you that your resignation has been accepted with effectfrom 8thApril, 2005. You should make arrangements to surrender all Service documents or property in your possession.
In respect of this letter, you are required to fill and return the Official Secrets Act Form for officers leaving the service and also complete the attached Service clearance form.
Wishing you success in your future endeavors.
FIDEL J. MUMINA, EBS
FOR: DIRECTOR GENERAL”
7. In a subsequent letter dated 27th June 2005, the Claimant was advised on disbursement of his benefits under the NSIS Staff Superannuation Scheme.
In my understanding, this part of the Claimant’s benefits is not in dispute.
8. What is in issue is whether the Claimant was entitled to additional benefits under the Pensions Act. It is the Respondent’s case that having voluntarily resigned from the Service the Claimant cannot lay a claim under the Pensions Act.
9. In support of its case, the Respondent cites Regulation 38(2) of the Code of Regulations which provides that employees who voluntarily resign from Government service forfeit all claims to retirement benefits under the Pensions Act.
10. In the final submissions filed on behalf of the Respondent, it is submitted that under Section 6 of the Pensions Act as read together with Regulations 6 and 26 of the Pensions Regulations, a public officer is eligible for grant of pension only when he retires from the service of Government in any of the following circumstances:
a) Attainment of retirement age;
b) Abolition or re-organization of office;
c) Permanent disability; and
d) Public interest
11. The Claimant states that his resignation was not voluntary. I have however looked at his resignation letter which I have reproduced above and do not find any evidence of coercion exerted on him to resign. I say so having taken notice of the Claimant’s complaints about his working conditions which in my view cannot be said to have caused any such coercion.
12. There was also no evidence that the Claimant left the Respondent’s employment on account of permanent disability.
13. Having found that the Claimant’s resignation was voluntary, I must agree with the Respondent that he is not entitled to retirement benefits under the Pensions Act.
14. The result is that the Claimant’s claim fails and is dismissed with no order for costs.
15. Orders accordingly.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 2NDDAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016
LINNET NDOLO
JUDGE
Appearance:
Francis Bundi Kimathi (the Claimant in person)
Miss Chege for the Respondent