[2012] KEHC 4223 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 4223 (KLR)

The court found that, given the parties' inability to agree on a property management company and the need to preserve the properties registered under Ambassadeur Investments (K) Limited, it was necessary to appoint a neutral and reputable management company. After evaluating the profiles, pricing, and objections...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 4223 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Francis Chege Maina & 4 Others; Defendant: John Kaguma Maina & 2 Others; Plaintiff: Kenwide Investments Limited; Defendant: Francis Chege Maina & 4 Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 394 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Ruling on Appointment of Property Manager Pending Hearing and Determination of Consolidated Suit
Outcome
interlocutory orders granted; property manager appointed
Judges
C.N Mutava
Legal Topics
Company Management Disputes, Appointment of Receiver Manager, Interlocutory Orders, Property Management
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Company Management Disputes Appointment of Receiver Manager Interlocutory Orders Property Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Chege Maina & 4 Others

Plaintiff

John Kaguma Maina & 2 Others

Defendant

Kenwide Investments Limited

Plaintiff

Francis Chege Maina & 4 Others

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Interlocutory Ruling on Appointment of Property Manager Pending Hearing and Determination of Consolidated Suit

  1. 1 Whether the court should appoint a property management company to manage properties registered under Ambassadeur Investments (K) Limited pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Which management company is suitable for appointment given the parties' inability to agree.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, given the parties' inability to agree on a property management company and the need to preserve the properties registered under Ambassadeur Investments (K) Limited, it was necessary to appoint a neutral and reputable management company. After evaluating the profiles, pricing, and objections raised regarding the nominated firms, the court exercised its discretion under Order 41 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010, and appointed M/s Lloyd Masika Limited as the property manager. The court further directed the parties and their advocates to facilitate a smooth handover and to discuss the modalities of opening a bank account for the management of the properties, ensuring...

Court Disposition

interlocutory orders granted; property manager appointed

Orders

  • M/s Lloyd Masika Limited is appointed as Manager of the properties registered under Ambassadeur Investments (K) Limited with effect from 1st June 2012.
  • Representatives of each party and their advocates to meet with the appointed company by or before 31st May 2012 for handover and to discuss modalities of opening a bank account in line with previous court directions.