[2021] KEELRC 721 (KLR)
The Court found that the cause of action arose on 11th November 2013, and the claim was filed on 19th October 2016, which was within the three-year limitation period prescribed by Section 90 of the Employment Act. Therefore, the claim was not statute barred. The Preliminary Objection was not merited and was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 721 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Francis Gitonga; Respondent: Roy Parcel Services Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2157 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Judges
- AN Makau
- Legal Topics
- Limitation Periods, Employment Termination, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Gitonga
Claimant
Roy Parcel Services Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim is statute barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act.
- 2 Whether the Preliminary Objection on limitation is merited.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the cause of action arose on 11th November 2013, and the claim was filed on 19th October 2016, which was within the three-year limitation period prescribed by Section 90 of the Employment Act. Therefore, the claim was not statute barred. The Preliminary Objection was not merited and was dismissed. No order as to costs was made since the Claimant did not oppose the objection.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- The Preliminary Objection is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2157 OF 2016
FRANCIS GITONGA................................................................................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
ROY PARCEL SERVICES LIMITED...............................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Respondent through the Preliminary Objection dated 10th July, 2020 raises the matter of limitation. Counsel for the Respondent has articulated that the Claim which was filed on 13th October, 2016 is statute barred by dint of Section 90 of the Employment Act. She asserts that the cause of action arose on 11th October 2013 and being an employment dispute had 3 years limitation. She urges the disallowance of the suit for being limited and statute barred.
2. The Claimant did not file any opposition to the Objection and to boot are absent today despite being present in Court on 26th July 2021 when the Hon. Deputy Registrar of this Court set today for hearing of the Preliminary Objection.
3. The objection taken is well founded and Preliminary Objection in the case of Mukisa Biscuit Manufactures Company Limitedv West End Distributors [1968] EA 398 is that a Preliminary Objection may be raised where a question of limitation is in issue.
4. The Claimant’s cause of action occurred on 11th November 2013. By filing his Claim on 19th October 2016, he was within time as the limitation would have set on 11th November 2013 as the date the letter was clear he terminated his employ with Respondent as per the Memo from the Respondent. As such the limitation had not set in by the time of the filing of the suit. As such Preliminary Objection fails and is dismissed with no order as to costs since Claimant did not even attempt to oppose it.
5. Mention of the Cause on 19th October 2021 to obtain directions on the hearing of the suit. Notice to issue.
It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021
NZIOKI WA MAKAU
JUDGE