[2020] KEELC 794 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 794 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had not established that a proper request for information or action had been made to the County Surveyor, Kirinyaga County, as required under Section 8(1) of the Access to Information Act and Article 35 of the Constitution. The evidence presented, including a letter dated 13th...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 794 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Francis Kithaka Cubi; Plaintiff: Joseph Mugo Cubi; Plaintiff: John Warui Cubi; Plaintiff: Gabriel Muthigani Cubi; Defendant: Isaack Isiak Cubi Alias Ichika Chobi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kerugoya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 265 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Mutation Forms, Access to Information, Public Officer Duties
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Execution of Decree Mutation Forms Access to Information Public Officer Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Kithaka Cubi

Plaintiff

Joseph Mugo Cubi

Plaintiff

John Warui Cubi

Plaintiff

Gabriel Muthigani Cubi

Plaintiff

Isaack Isiak Cubi Alias Ichika Chobi

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the County Surveyor, Kirinyaga County, can be compelled by court order to assign numbers on mutation forms for L.R. No. MWERUA/KITHUMBU/65 to effectuate a decree.
  2. 2 Whether the alternative order for the Executive Officer to sign mutation forms is available given prior orders and functus officio doctrine.
  3. 3 Whether a proper request for information or action was made to the County Surveyor as required by law before seeking judicial compulsion.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had not established that a proper request for information or action had been made to the County Surveyor, Kirinyaga County, as required under Section 8(1) of the Access to Information Act and Article 35 of the Constitution. The evidence presented, including a letter dated 13th February 2020, did not amount to a formal or sufficient request for the County Surveyor to assign mutation numbers. Furthermore, the alternative relief sought had already been granted in a previous application, and the court was functus officio regarding that order. The court emphasized that judicial compulsion of a public officer requires clear evidence of a request and refusal...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 13th March 2020 is dismissed as premature and unmeritorious.
  • Each party shall bear their own costs.