[2013] KEHC 3998 (KLR)
The court found that the conviction for grievous harm was safe and supported by the evidence, including medical testimony and the appellant's own admission of assault. The sentence of four years was lawful and not harsh in the circumstances. However, considering the appellant's age, the period already served, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 3998 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Francis Muriuki Kariuki; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 114 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Grievous Harm, Sentencing Principles, Appeal on Sentence, Penal Code Section 234
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Muriuki Kariuki
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of four years imprisonment for grievous harm was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the appellant's age and time already served warranted a reduction of sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the conviction for grievous harm was safe and supported by the evidence, including medical testimony and the appellant's own admission of assault. The sentence of four years was lawful and not harsh in the circumstances. However, considering the appellant's age, the period already served, and the fact that the State did not oppose the application, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to the period already served. The appeal succeeded only to the extent of sentence reduction, and the appellant was ordered to be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The appellant's sentence is reduced to the period already served.
- The appellant shall be set free unless otherwise lawfully held under a separate warrant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Embu
Criminal Appeal 114 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif]
FRANCIS MURIUKI KARIUKI....................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.............................................................RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the Sentence and Conviction of L.K. MUTAI Principal Magistrate Embu in Criminal Case No. 1369 of 2010 on 4th November 2010)
J U D G M E N T
FRANCIS MURIUKI KARIUKI hereinafter referred to as the appellant was charged with the offence of Grievous Harm contrary to Section 234 of the Penal Code. The particulars as stated in the charge sheet were as follows:-
On the 13th day of May 2010 at 3. 00 p.m. at Njukiri Village, in Embu District within Eastern province, unlawfully did grievous harm to AGATA KANINI.
The matter proceeded to full hearing and the appellant was convicted and sentenced to 4 years imprisonment 0n 4/10/2010. And being aggrieved by the judgment he appealed against both conviction and sentence raising the following grounds:-
He pleaded not guilty.
That the custodial sentence of four years was harsh and excessive.
That he is old and sick requiring treatment regularly.
When the appeal came before me for hearing the appellant abandoned his appeal against conviction. He therefore asked the Court to consider that he had served a larger part of his sentence and was left with a period of about 3 months to go. The State was not opposed to this application.
As a first appeal Court I have the duty to reconsider and reevaluate the evidence adduced in the Court below, and arrive at my own conclusion. Ref. OKENO VS REPUBLIC [1972] EA 32.
From the evidence adduced the complainant had on 13/5/2010 3 p.m gone to fetch water. On her way back as she carried the jerricane of water she heard footsteps behind her and somebody retorting “hapo ni hapo”. On turning back she saw her neighbour (the appellant) who told her he had waited for a long time. He kicked her above the knee joint causing her to fall down. He held her neck squeezing it. He hit her head with his. He then punched her jaws knocking off two of her lower incisor teeth. He left her there and she went home. The matter was reported to Embu Police Station and she was taken to Hospital by her daughter (PW2). She denied stealing the appellants cassava.
PW2 stated that her mother (PW1) returned home from the river appearing beaten. She told her it was the appellant who had beaten her. PW3 confirmed receiving the report of assault the same day. PW4 Dr. Njuki Njiru confirmed that PW1 had been injured and her two lower incisor teeth had been knocked off.
In his defence the appellant admitted assaulting the complainant. He however said he did so because he found her stealing his cassava. DW1 said he only found the appellant holding PW1.
From the evidence above there is no dispute that the appellant and PW1 had a confrontation that afternoon of 13/5/2010. Even the appellant admitted having assaulted the complainant by slapping her. He however does not say on which part of the body he slapped her. He took the law into his own hands.
The medical evidence confirms the injuries suffered by the complainant. The same was assessed as maim. It is clear that the appellant is the one who caused this injury. The appellant abandoned his appeal on conviction. And after evaluating the evidence adduced I am satisfied that the learned trial Magistrate arrived at the right conclusion and the conviction is safe.
The sentence of 4 years is lawful and was not harsh. The appellant has however pleaded for a reduction of the sentence since he will be completing his sentence on 4/7/2013. The state did not oppose this application. Considering his age (as I have seen him in Court) I believe the appellant has learnt his lesson in Prison for the period he has been there.
I will reduce his sentence to the period already served. To that extent only does this appeal succeed. He will beset free unless otherwise held separately under a separate warrant.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT EMBU THIS 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2013.
H.I. ONG'UDI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ms. Macharia for Prosecution
Appellant
Nyaga Cc
[if gte mso 9]><![endif]