[2018] KEELRC 1105 (KLR)

[2018] KEELRC 1105 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was not a casual but a regular employee, having worked continuously for over a year. The respondent failed to provide evidence of valid reason or due process in terminating the claimant's employment, rendering the dismissal unfair under Section 45(2) of the Employment Act. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELRC 1105 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Francis Musera Ndanyi; Respondent: Top Food (E.A) Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 672 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed in part; respondent's counterclaim dismissed.
Judges
DO Ogal
Legal Topics
Unfair Termination, Casual Vs Regular Employment, Workplace Injury, Overtime Pay, Statutory Entitlements, Service Pay
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Termination Casual Vs Regular Employment Workplace Injury Overtime Pay Statutory Entitlements Service Pay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Musera Ndanyi

Claimant

Top Food (E.A) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was a casual or regular employee.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's employment was wrongfully terminated.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant sustained a back injury in the course of employment and is entitled to damages.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was not a casual but a regular employee, having worked continuously for over a year. The respondent failed to provide evidence of valid reason or due process in terminating the claimant's employment, rendering the dismissal unfair under Section 45(2) of the Employment Act. The court accepted the claimant's evidence of back injury, supported by medical records, and awarded the cost of further treatment as specified in the medical report. The court further found the claimant entitled to underpayments for rest days, pay in lieu of notice, service pay, pay for public holidays, overtime, and leave, as the respondent did not specifically deny these claims and...

Court Disposition

Claim allowed in part; respondent's counterclaim dismissed.

Orders

  • The claimant is awarded Kshs.33,800 for underpayments.
  • The claimant is awarded Kshs.9,750 in lieu of notice.