[2015] KEELRC 755 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 755 (KLR)

The court found that the application for interlocutory orders was premature and unmerited because the change of officials had not yet been registered by the Registrar of Trade Unions. The Registrar had already halted the registration process pending the court's determination of the dispute. As such, there was no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 755 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Francis Musyimi; Applicant: Jomo Joseph Kirwa; Applicant: Joseph Mwangi Ngatia; Respondent: John Ochieng; Respondent: Peter Nthaka; Respondent: Rose J. Martin; Respondent: Ernest Nakenya Nadome, General Secretary Kenya Electrical Trade & Allied Workers Union; Respondent: Registrar of Trade Unions
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1999 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Trade Union Officials, Interlocutory Injunctions, Registration of Officials
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Trade Union Officials Interlocutory Injunctions Registration of Officials

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Musyimi

Applicant

Jomo Joseph Kirwa

Applicant

Joseph Mwangi Ngatia

Applicant

John Ochieng

Respondent

Peter Nthaka

Respondent

Rose J. Martin

Respondent

Ernest Nakenya Nadome, General Secretary Kenya Electrical Trade & Allied Workers Union

Respondent

Registrar of Trade Unions

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respondents should be restrained from assuming office as officials of the union pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the 5th respondent should be restrained from effecting registration of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd respondents as officials pending the hearing of the suit.
  3. 3 Whether the special general meeting held on 1st November 2014 was validly convened and whether notice was properly served on the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for interlocutory orders was premature and unmerited because the change of officials had not yet been registered by the Registrar of Trade Unions. The Registrar had already halted the registration process pending the court's determination of the dispute. As such, there was no imminent threat or action to be restrained, rendering the application unnecessary at this stage. The court was persuaded by the submissions of the 5th respondent's counsel and dismissed the application, directing the parties to proceed with the hearing of the main suit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed as premature and unmerited.
  • The parties are to proceed with the hearing of the main suit.