[1997] KECA 156 (KLR)

[1997] KECA 156 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time, only four days after the previous appeal was struck out for a purely technical reason—the failure to translate an exhibit from Kikuyu to English. The court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] KECA 156 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Francis Mwangi Mucheru; Respondent: Hannah Mburu Kiarie
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 139 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Extension of time granted.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Procedural Non Compliance
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Procedural Non Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Mwangi Mucheru

Applicant

Hannah Mburu Kiarie

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time after the previous appeal was struck out for procedural non-compliance.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in bringing the application was excusable given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time, only four days after the previous appeal was struck out for a purely technical reason—the failure to translate an exhibit from Kikuyu to English. The court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, noting that the fault was not substantive but technical, and that justice would be better served by allowing the applicant to pursue the intended appeal. The respondent's right to file a cross appeal was preserved. Costs were ordered to be in the intended appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Extension of time granted.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted 7 days from the date of this ruling to file the notice of appeal.
  • The applicant is granted thirty days thereafter to file the record of appeal.