[2001] KEHC 132 (KLR)
The court found both parties contributed equally to the accident: the plaintiff was negligent in the manner he crossed the road, while the defendant failed to exercise due caution given the presence of pedestrians. Liability was apportioned at 50% to each party. The court assessed general damages for pain and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 132 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Francis Mwangi Muchine; Defendant: Francis Kimani Mbugua
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 2637 of 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff with damages apportioned at 50%.
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accidents, Personal Injury, Apportionment of Liability, Assessment of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Mwangi Muchine
Plaintiff
Francis Kimani Mbugua
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff in the motor vehicle/pedestrian accident.
- 2 What is the appropriate apportionment of liability between the plaintiff and defendant.
- 3 What quantum of damages is payable to the plaintiff for pain and suffering.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found both parties contributed equally to the accident: the plaintiff was negligent in the manner he crossed the road, while the defendant failed to exercise due caution given the presence of pedestrians. Liability was apportioned at 50% to each party. The court assessed general damages for pain and suffering at Ksh.100,000/-, but after applying the 50% liability apportionment, awarded a net sum of Ksh.50,000/- to the plaintiff. No special damages were awarded as they were neither pleaded nor proved. Costs and interest from the date of judgment were awarded to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff with damages apportioned at 50%.
Orders
- Plaintiff awarded Ksh.50,000/- as general damages for pain and suffering, subject to 50% liability apportionment.
- No award for special damages; claim dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
42 paragraphs
1. Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident 2. Male adult aged 29 years in 1991 3. Injuries: Fracture of left humerus Fracture of left tibia and fibula 4. Liability 50%:50% 5. Quantum: General Damages Pain and suffering – Ksh.100,000/- subject to apportionment Special Damages not pleaded.
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL CASE NO.2637 OF 1994
FRANCIS MWANGI MUCHINE …………………………. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
FRANCIS KIMANI MBUGUA ………………………….. DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
Francis Mwangi Muchine was walking along Juja road in Nairobi at about 10. 30 p.m. He had come from work. Whilst on the said road and walking to the said of the road, he alleged that the defendant’s vehicle of Francis Kimani Mbugua left the road and knocked him. He now sues for damages.
Francis claimed he sustained injuries and was rushed to hospital after the accident. The injuries sustained was a fracture to the left humerus and a fracture to the left tibia and fibula. He produced a medical report to confirm this.
The defendant, Francis Kimani, admits that he was the driver of the vehicle in question. That as he was driving along the Juja road he noted three persons crossing the road; when suddenly one came to his path and he knocked him.
1. Liability
From the evidence before me I find that the story given by the defendant is reliable. The defendant states that the plaintiff after crossing the road with three persons, came back to the road and was knocked. The accident of 28. 8.91 was caused and or substantially contributed by the negligence of the plaintiff who ought to have taken care in the manner in which he crossed the road. The defendant on the other hand ought to have been cautious at all times knowing that there were pedestrians who had just crossed the road before the accident occurred. I would compute liability between the parties at 50% ratio to 50%. Issues 1, 2 and 3 has been dealt with.
2. Quantum
The plaintiff sustained injuries. The medical report he produced showed he had earlier on had old fractures. His doctor placed disability at 25%.
The defendant had relied on a medical report, being a second opinion from his doctor stated the injuries sustained was a simple fracture of the neck of the left hummers. Simple fracture of the left tibia and fibular malleoli. The injuries were well cured. The doctors reported stated that scars had healed well leaving him with no “detectable disability.”
Mr. Mbigi for the plaintiff prayed this court awards Ksh.600,000/-. He relied on two cases that gave lower awards namely:-
John Kingara Nderi
Vs
Gachini Kagwe
Hccc 4750/93
And the case of:-
Jane Hoke Omega
Vs
James Kiarie Wambura
Hcc No.4216/93
That gave a sum of Ksh.450,000/- and 287,000/- respectively.
The latter case was actually Ksh.200,000/- . The 87,000/- referred to Special Damages and Future Medical costs. The award of ksh.600,000/- is unrealistic. I would award in this case a sum of Ksh.100,000/- as far as the circumstances, subject to apportionment. As to Special damages the plaint stated: “To be supplied at the hearing thereof.” Special Damages must not only be pleaded but it must be tabulated and proved. As such, I make no award on this head of damage and dismiss it. I accordingly enter judgment of the plaintiff as follows:
In summary:
1) Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident
2) Male adult aged 29 years in 1991
3) Injuries:
i) Fracture of the left humerus
ii) Fracture of the le ft tibia and fibular
5. Liability 50% against the defendant
6. General Damages
Pain and suffering Ksh.100,000/-
Less 50% Ksh.50,000/-
Net total Ksh.50,000/-
7. Special damages - dismissed
I award costs to the plaintiff. I award interest from the date of judgment.
Dated this 3rd day of May, 2001 at Nairobi.
M.A. ANG’AWA
JUDGE