[2013] KEELRC 163 (KLR)

[2013] KEELRC 163 (KLR)

The court held that the claim was filed outside the three-year limitation period stipulated by Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007. The statutory language is mandatory and does not permit the court to extend time for filing employment claims. The claimant did not apply for extension of time, and ongoing...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEELRC 163 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Francis Mwaura Mboche; Respondent: Nacico Co-operative Savings & Credit Society
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1513 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
claim dismissed as time-barred
Judges
J Rika
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Retirement Benefits, Statutory Bar, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Retirement Benefits Statutory Bar Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Mwaura Mboche

Claimant

Nacico Co-operative Savings & Credit Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the claim was filed within the statutory limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to extend time for filing employment claims beyond the statutory period.
  3. 3 Whether ongoing communication regarding retirement benefits affects the limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the claim was filed outside the three-year limitation period stipulated by Section 90 of the Employment Act 2007. The statutory language is mandatory and does not permit the court to extend time for filing employment claims. The claimant did not apply for extension of time, and ongoing communication with the employer regarding retirement benefits did not suspend or extend the limitation period. Consequently, the preliminary objection was upheld and the claim was dismissed as time-barred.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed as time-barred

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed for being filed outside the statutory limitation period.
  • No order as to costs.