[2019] KEHC 4511 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent had ultimately complied with the order to deposit the decretal amount in a joint account, albeit not within the stipulated time. The delay in compliance did not cause irreparable harm to the applicant, and there were no sufficient grounds to deny the respondent the right of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 4511 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Francis Njogu Njehia; Respondent: Tito Kibet Mibei
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 93 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review and Setting Aside of Stay Orders
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- AM Githinji
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Review of Orders, Security for Decretal Amount
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Njogu Njehia
Appellant
Tito Kibet Mibei
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review and Setting Aside of Stay Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent complied with the court's order to deposit the decretal amount as security for stay of execution.
- 2 Whether the delay in compliance with the court's order warranted setting aside the stay of execution.
- 3 Whether sufficient grounds exist to deny the respondent the right of appeal due to late compliance.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent had ultimately complied with the order to deposit the decretal amount in a joint account, albeit not within the stipulated time. The delay in compliance did not cause irreparable harm to the applicant, and there were no sufficient grounds to deny the respondent the right of appeal. The defect of late compliance was deemed curable, and the application to set aside the stay orders was dismissed in its entirety. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 1st April 2019 is dismissed in its entirety.
- Costs be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT
AT ELDORET
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 93 OF 2018
FRANCIS NJOGU NJEHIA.........................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
TITO KIBET MIBEI.................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
This is a ruling on a Notice of Motion application by the respondent herein, Tito Kibet Mibei, dated 1st April 2019. The respondent prayed that this court reviews and sets aside its orders made on 20th November 2018 that granted the appellant stay of execution pending the hearing and determination the appeal arising from Eldoret CMCC No. 71 of 2014.
The applicant further prays that the court grants him leave to execute against the applicant for failure to comply with this order on 11th December 2018.
This court, in a ruling dated 20th November 2018 ordered that the applicant deposits the full decretal amount in an interest earning account in the name of the advocates for both parties as security pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
The respondent, in his replying affidavit dated 8th April 2019, denies that he had failed to honor the court’s ruling dated 20th November 2018. He claims that his advocates have been in constant communication with the applicant advocates on the opening of the joint account. The respondent further claims that the said joint account was opened on 17th February 2019. He attached a confirmation to the same marked as FNN3.
The respondent further averred that he instructed his insurance company to deposit the said decretal amount. He attached an alleged mail sent to his insurance company as proof of the same, marked as FNN4.
The respondent contends that the application at hand is overtaken by events as he has discharged his end of the bargain. The respondent attached a copy of EFT marked as FNN5, as a proof of making the deposit.
The respondent therefore prays that this application, dated 1st April 2019 be dismissed.
Given the foregoing, this court is satisfied that that the decretal amount has been deposited in an account under the names of both advocates. This court further notes that compliance with the court’s orders dated 20th November 2018 was not in time.
However, this court is of the view that the defect is curable as there would be no irreparable harm occasioned on the applicant herein should this application be dismissed. There has been raised no sufficient ground upon which to deny the respondent the right of appeal due to late compliance with a precursor condition to the intended appeal. The application is therefore dismissed in its entirety. Costs be in the cause.
Dated and delivered at Eldoret this 23rd day of July 2019
S. M GITHINJI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Mugambi for the Respondent
Ms Chebotibin holding brief for Mr. Kurgat for the Appellant.
Court Clerk - Sarah
S. M GITHINJI
JUDGE