[2007] KEHC 751 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 751 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, as he waited 18 years before seeking relief and sought orders against persons not party to the suit. The court held that it would be acting in vain to issue orders affecting non-parties and that the delay was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 751 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Francis Njunge; Respondent: Chiuma Njambuya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 159 of 2006
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Pending Summons for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to respondent
Legal Topics
Succession Proceedings, Revocation of Grant, Injunctive Relief, Locus Standi
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Succession Proceedings Revocation of Grant Injunctive Relief Locus Standi

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francis Njunge

Applicant

Chiuma Njambuya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Pending Summons for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to injunctive orders restraining the respondent from dealing with the suit properties pending determination of the summons for revocation of grant.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi and a prima facie case to warrant the orders sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not demonstrated a prima facie case with a probability of success, as he waited 18 years before seeking relief and sought orders against persons not party to the suit. The court held that it would be acting in vain to issue orders affecting non-parties and that the delay was unjustified. Consequently, the application for injunctive relief was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to respondent

Orders

  • The application for injunctive relief is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.