[2018] KEELRC 2310 (KLR)
The court found that the application for an order compelling the respondents to deposit KES 50,000,000 as security was premature. The applicants had not exhausted the statutory procedures available under sections 66 to 73 of the Employment Act, 2007, which require making a written application to the Cabinet...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 2310 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Francis Nzuki Mulu and 43 Others (being former employees of Dubaibank Kenya Limited in Liquidation); Respondent: Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation; Respondent: Mr. Adam Boru, Liquidation Agent Dubai Bank Kenya Limited (in Liquidation); Respondent: The Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Labour and Social Services
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2512 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- MN Nduma, DO Ogal
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Unpaid Salaries, Liquidation Procedure, Employment Act Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Nzuki Mulu and 43 Others (being former employees of Dubaibank Kenya Limited in Liquidation)
Applicant
Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation
Respondent
Mr. Adam Boru, Liquidation Agent Dubai Bank Kenya Limited (in Liquidation)
Respondent
The Cabinet Secretary Ministry of Labour and Social Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents should be ordered to deposit KES 50,000,000 in court as security for the applicants' employment claims.
- 2 Whether the application for security was premature in light of statutory procedures under the Employment Act, 2007.
- 3 Whether the applicants should first pursue remedies under sections 66 to 73 of the Employment Act, 2007 before seeking court intervention.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for an order compelling the respondents to deposit KES 50,000,000 as security was premature. The applicants had not exhausted the statutory procedures available under sections 66 to 73 of the Employment Act, 2007, which require making a written application to the Cabinet Secretary for Labour and Social Services. Furthermore, the Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation, as a government entity, was deemed capable of meeting its financial obligations, negating the necessity for a security deposit. The court therefore dismissed the application, emphasizing the need for the applicants to first pursue the statutory remedies and ongoing out-of-court settlement...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for deposit of KES 50,000,000 as security is dismissed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
39 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2512 OF 2016
(BEFORE HON. JUSTICE MATHEWS N. NDUMA)
FRANCIS NZUKI MULU AND 43 OTHERS (BEING FORMER EMPLOYEES OF
DUBAIBANK KENYA LIMITED IN LIQUIDATION).......…...…..CLAIMANT/APP.
VERSUS
KENYA DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATIONS..............1ST RESPONDENT
MR. ADAM BORU LIQUIDATION AGENT DUBAI BANK KENYA LIMITED
(IN LIQUIDATION)………......................................................2ND RESPONDENT
THE CABINET SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND SOCIAL
SERVICES ………..........................................……........….3RD RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The applicant seeks an injunction couched in the following terms–
i. THAT this application be certified urgent, service thereof be dispensed with and heard ex-parte in the first instance.
ii. THAT pending hearing and determination of this application and or suit, the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents jointly and severally be ordered to deposit the sum of Kenya Shillings Fifty Million (Kshs.50,000,000/=) in Court forthwith as security or such sum thereof as may be sufficient to satisfy the decree that may be passed against them in this suit for the claim in respect of unpaid salaries, leave, notice in lieu of termination and compensation.
iii. THAT this Honourable Court be pleased to grant any other order under the circumstances and an urgent hearing date for this suit.
iv. THAT the costs of this application be provided for.
2. The application is supported on the grounds set out on the notice of motion and in the supporting affidavit of Francis Nzuki Mulu sworn on 5/12/2016.
3. The application is opposed vide a replying affidavit of Adam Boru, the 2nd respondent in which the deponent states that the 1st Respondent Kenya Deposit Insurance Corporation is a Government Corporation and will be able to meet all its financial obligations without necessity of depositing any money in court and security.
4. That the Respondent is still committed to settle the Claims made in respect of salaries owed to the employees of the 1st Respondent now under receivership.
5. That insured Depositors take first priority in payment and all other claims including those by the Claimants will be made.
6. The 3rd Respondent on the other hand invites the Claimants to make an application to the cabinet secretary in terms of section 66 to 73 to The Employment Act, 2007.
7. The 3rd Respondent urges the court to find that this application by the Claimants is premature and the court do direct the Claimants to make written application to the 3rd Respondent accordingly.
8. The parties filed submissions in support of the respective positions.
9. The court is of the considered view that this application was made prematurely. That the applicant ought to follow the provisions under section 66 to 73 of the Employment Act, and in addition continue to pursue the out of court settlement that is ensuing.
10. Accordingly, the application lacks merit and is dismissed with no orders as to costs.
11. The main suit to be set down for hearing on a priority basis if settlement is not arrived upon.
Dated and Signed in Kisumu this 6th day of February, 2018
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Delivered and signed in Nairobi this 2nd day of March, 2018
Maureen Onyango
Judge
Appearances
Mr. Mandala & Co. for Claimant
Mr. Mbaka for 1st & 2nd Respondent
M/s. Odhiambo for 3rd Respondent
Anne Njung’e – Court Clerk