[2014] KEHC 3574 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 3574 (KLR)

The court held that section 315 of the Penal Code, under which the applicant was convicted, does not provide for an option of a fine and prescribes a sentence of up to three years' imprisonment. The trial court's decision to sentence the applicant to 28 months' imprisonment for each count, to run concurrently, was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 3574 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Frank Amour Nzamba; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 3 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Application for Revision of Sentence
Outcome
Application for revision declined.
Legal Topics
Cheating Offence, Sentencing Principles, Revision of Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Cheating Offence Sentencing Principles Revision of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frank Amour Nzamba

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Application for Revision of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for the offence of cheating under section 315 of the Penal Code should have included an option of a fine.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in sentencing the applicant to imprisonment without an option of a fine.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that section 315 of the Penal Code, under which the applicant was convicted, does not provide for an option of a fine and prescribes a sentence of up to three years' imprisonment. The trial court's decision to sentence the applicant to 28 months' imprisonment for each count, to run concurrently, was therefore lawful. There was no legal basis to interfere with the sentence as imposed by the trial court, and the application for revision was declined.

Court Disposition

Application for revision declined.

Orders

  • The application for revision of sentence is declined.