[2019] KEHC 46 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 46 (KLR)

The court found that the sentence imposed on the applicant in Bondo PM Cr. Case No. 1066/2018 was lenient and appropriate. The applicant did not demonstrate any illegality, impropriety, or excessiveness in the sentence that would justify revision. Furthermore, the applicant stands to benefit from remission subject...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 46 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Frankline Odhiambo Okumu; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 82 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Leniency of Sentence, Remission of Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Leniency of Sentence Remission of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frankline Odhiambo Okumu

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a revision of the sentence imposed in Bondo PM Cr. Case No. 1066/2018.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the sentence imposed on the applicant in Bondo PM Cr. Case No. 1066/2018 was lenient and appropriate. The applicant did not demonstrate any illegality, impropriety, or excessiveness in the sentence that would justify revision. Furthermore, the applicant stands to benefit from remission subject to good conduct and industry while in prison. Therefore, there was no merit in the application for sentence revision.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for sentence revision is dismissed.