[1999] KECA 80 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the trial in the High Court was a nullity because it commenced with only two assessors instead of the mandatory three, as required by section 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The defect was fundamental and could not be cured by section 298(1), which applies only after a trial has...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1999] KECA 80 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Fred Kipchumba Chepkwony; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 27 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; retrial ordered.
- Judges
- JE Gicheru, AB Shah
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter Trial Procedure, Trial With Assessors, Nullity of Trial, Retrial Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fred Kipchumba Chepkwony
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial in the High Court was a nullity due to non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of three assessors.
- 2 Whether the conviction and sentence for manslaughter could stand in light of the procedural irregularity.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the trial in the High Court was a nullity because it commenced with only two assessors instead of the mandatory three, as required by section 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The defect was fundamental and could not be cured by section 298(1), which applies only after a trial has commenced. As a result, the conviction and sentence for manslaughter could not stand. The Court set aside the conviction and sentence and ordered an expeditious retrial before a different judge of the High Court in the interest of justice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction and sentence set aside; retrial ordered.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction and sentence are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, SHAH & BOSIRE JJ.A) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 27 OF 1999
BETWEEN
FRED KIPCHUMBA CHEPKWONY...............................APPELLANT AND REPUBLIC....................................................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a conviction and judgment of the High Court of Kenya in Embu (Mr. Justice Etyang, J) dated 7th March, 1997
in
H.C.CR. CASE NO. 1 OF 1995 ******************* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
This appeal arises out of a conviction for the offence of manslaughter, entered by the superior court (Etyang', J). The appellant was one of the three accused persons in the superior court. Of the three, one Cosmas Mulwa is dead. The second one, Kenneth Nyaga Muthenya, lodged an appeal against conviction and sentence. That appeal, being Criminal Appeal No. 47 of 1998, was allowed by this Court, sitting at Nyeri, on 10th May, 1999 on the ground that the whole trial was nullity and ordered an expeditious retrial before any other judgeC.r iminal Appeal No. 47 of 1998 was allowed as the trial itself was a nullity, only two assessors having taken part in the whole trial ab initio.This court said:
"with respect to the learned judge the trial had not started so section 298(1) which applies to absence of an assessor during the course of a trial with the aid of assessors was not applicable at that stage. Section 263 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which is mandatory provides as follows:-
"263. When the trial is to be held with the aid of assessors, the number of assessors shall be three"
It therefore follows that when a trial is to be held with the aid of assessors the trial court cannot start the trial with less than three assessors, as to do so would vitiate the trial. Section 298(1) of Criminal Procedure Code applies only where the trial has already commenced. The appellant's trial was in the result illegal"
The same result must, of course, follow here. We are concerned at the absence of a representative from the office of the Attorney General although that office was notified of the hearing date, for this appeal, on 11th August, 1999. It is a matter of concern and lament. It is not for the first time that this has happened.
We allow this appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence and in the interest of justice we order an expeditious retrial before any other judge of the High Court.
These are our orders.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 20th day of September, 1999.
J.E. GICHERU
...............
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A.B. SHAH
.................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S.E.O BOSIRE
................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR.