[2020] KEHC 9044 (KLR)
The court found the petition for resentencing incompetent because the petitioner failed to attach the lower court's proceedings and judgment, which are necessary for the court to consider a resentencing application. Furthermore, the court held that the appropriate remedy for the petitioner, who was dissatisfied with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 9044 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Fred Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 46 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Petition for Resentencing
- Outcome
- petition dismissed as incompetent
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Defilement Offence, Resentencing, Sentence Appeals
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fred Odhiambo
Petitioner
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Petition for Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petition for resentencing is competent in the absence of lower court proceedings and judgment.
- 2 Whether the petitioner should have appealed against sentence rather than file a petition for resentencing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the petition for resentencing incompetent because the petitioner failed to attach the lower court's proceedings and judgment, which are necessary for the court to consider a resentencing application. Furthermore, the court held that the appropriate remedy for the petitioner, who was dissatisfied with the sentence imposed, was to file an appeal against the sentence rather than a constitutional petition for resentencing. The absence of the required documents and the improper procedure led to the dismissal of the petition.
Court Disposition
petition dismissed as incompetent
Orders
- The petition for resentencing is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 46 OF 2019
(CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.)
FRED ODHIAMBO..........................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
REPUBLIC......................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Petitioner is in prison and has not been produced in court. I however, observe that the Petition is for resentencing. There are no court proceedings and judgment of the Lower Court attached.
2. Defilement under Section 8(1)(2) is an offence that carries up to life imprisonment but the petitioner was given only 20 years imprisonment. He should have appealed against sentence instead of filing a Petition for resentencing. I hereby find this petition incompetent and I proceed to dismiss it.
3. Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at SIAYA this 27th Day of January 2020.
R.E. ABURILI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Okachi: Prosecution Counsel for the State
Court Assistants: Brenda, Modestar