[2016] KEHC 3423 (KLR)
The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' employment dispute, which concerned claims of unlawful redundancy and terminal dues against their employer. Relying on the Court of Appeal's guidance in Prof. Daniel N. Mugendi vs Kenyatta University, the court held that employment...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 3423 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Fred Oginga Igonyi & 62 Others; Defendant: Ogembo Tea Factory
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 17 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
- Outcome
- Suit transferred to Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu for hearing and determination.
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unlawful Termination, Jurisdiction, Transfer of Suit
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fred Oginga Igonyi & 62 Others
Plaintiff
Ogembo Tea Factory
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the plaintiffs' employment dispute.
- 2 Whether the suit should be reinstated and/or transferred to the appropriate court.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' employment dispute, which concerned claims of unlawful redundancy and terminal dues against their employer. Relying on the Court of Appeal's guidance in Prof. Daniel N. Mugendi vs Kenyatta University, the court held that employment and labour relations matters must be heard by the Employment and Labour Relations Court. Rather than dismissing or striking out the suit, the court exercised its discretion to transfer the matter to the appropriate forum to ensure substantive justice and avoid undue procedural technicalities. The court thus directed that the suit be referred to the Employment and Labour Relations...
Court Disposition
Suit transferred to Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu for hearing and determination.
Orders
- This matter is referred to the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu for hearing and determination.
- Mention in Kisumu on 24/10/2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CIVIL CASE NO.17 OF 2007
FRED OGINGA IGONYI & 62 OTHERS…PLAINTIFFS
VERSUS
OGEMBO TEA FACTORY…………...….. DEFENDANT
RULING
1. The plaintiffs’ suit was on 22nd July, 2015 dismissed under order 17 Rule 2 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules in the absence of both the plaintiffs and the defendant.
2. In their application dated 7th October, 2015, the plaintiffs now seek a setting aside of the orders of 22nd July, 2015 and a reinstatement of the suit for further hearing and disposal.
3. I have perused the pleadings in this case and I note that the cause of action relates to a labour dispute between the plaintiffs and the defendant, their employer in which the plaintiffs claim that they were unlawfully declared redundant and claim the payment of their terminal dues together with interests and costs of the suit.
4. In the case of Prof. Daniel N. Mugendi vs Kenyatta University, Benson I. Wairegi, Eliud Mathiu and Prof. Olive Mugenda CA. No. 6 of 2012, at page 11, the Court of Appeal held as follows:
“Believing as we do that the approach taken by Majanja J is the correct one, and in endevouring to meet the ends of justice untrammeled by procedural technicalities, we set aside the order striking out the appellant’s petition and direct that the High Court do transfer it to the Industrial Court which also has jurisdiction and authority to consider the claims of breach of fundamental rights as pertains to Industrial and Labour Relations matters. It is only just and proper that the Industrial Court do exclusively entertain those matters in the context and with regard to Article 165 (5) (b). And in order to do justice, in the event where the High Court or the Environment and Land Court comes across a matter that ought to be litigated in any of the other courts, It should be prudent to have the matter transferred to that court for hearing and determination. These three courts with similar/equal status should in the spirit of harmonization, effect necessary transfers among themselves until such time as the citizenry is well acquainted with the appropriate form for each kind of claim. However, parties should not file “mixed grill” causes in any court they fancy. This will only delay dispensation of justice.”
5. In view of the nature of the subject matter at hand and the dictum in the above cited case, I am of the opinion that this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain this matter and direct it be placed before the Employment and Labour Relations court for hearing and determination.
6. Consequently, I hereby direct that this matter be referred to the Employment and Labour court at Kisumu for hearing and determination. Mention in Kisumu on 24/10/2016.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court this 18th day of August, 2016
HON. W.A OKWANY
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Odero for Ondabu for Applicant
Mr. Nyangwencha for Nyachiro for Defendant
Omwoyo court clerk