[2013] KEHC 6221 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6221 (KLR)

The court held that the question of entitlement to be on a party list is an internal party matter that should be resolved through the party's internal dispute resolution mechanisms and, if necessary, through the mechanisms established under the Political Parties Act, 2011. The court found no error in the Committee's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6221 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fred Otieno Mwango; Applicant: Penina Akinyi Wandigu; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: The Chairman, Nominees Dispute Resolution Committee; Respondent: Monica Anyango Otieno
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 255 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Party List Nomination, Internal Party Disputes, Dispute Resolution Mechanisms
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Election Petitions Party List Nomination Internal Party Disputes Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fred Otieno Mwango

Applicant

Penina Akinyi Wandigu

Applicant

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

The Chairman, Nominees Dispute Resolution Committee

Respondent

Monica Anyango Otieno

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the inclusion of Monica Anyango Otieno on the Ford Kenya Party list for Migori County Assembly was lawful.
  2. 2 Whether the party failed to consider Penina Akinyi Wandigu for nomination to the Migori County Assembly party list.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute regarding party list nominations is justiciable before the court or should be resolved through internal party mechanisms.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the question of entitlement to be on a party list is an internal party matter that should be resolved through the party's internal dispute resolution mechanisms and, if necessary, through the mechanisms established under the Political Parties Act, 2011. The court found no error in the Committee's decision and determined that the petitioners had not demonstrated any legal basis for the court to intervene. The court also disregarded procedural deficiencies in the commencement of the proceedings, emphasizing the need to focus on substantive justice, particularly as the petitioners were unrepresented. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed for lack of merit.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The plaint is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.