[2018] KEELC 408 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 408 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction could not succeed because the actions complained of—demolition of structures—had already been completed pursuant to a valid court order issued in Machakos ELC. No. 204 of 2016. The Plaintiff was not a party to the earlier proceedings and did...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 408 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Frederick Musau Mwaniki; Defendant: Bosco Nthenge Nzioki
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 127 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Land Ownership Disputes, Eviction Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Land Ownership Disputes Eviction Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frederick Musau Mwaniki

Plaintiff

Bosco Nthenge Nzioki

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the Defendant from demolishing or dealing with the suit premises pending determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant's actions were pursuant to a valid court order in Machakos ELC. No. 204 of 2016.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction could not succeed because the actions complained of—demolition of structures—had already been completed pursuant to a valid court order issued in Machakos ELC. No. 204 of 2016. The Plaintiff was not a party to the earlier proceedings and did not seek to set aside or stay the judgment in that suit. Granting an injunction in the present circumstances would contradict the existing court order and undermine the administration of justice. The Plaintiff should have sought relief in the original suit where the eviction order was issued. Accordingly, the court dismissed the application for injunction.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Application dated 21st June, 2018 is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.