[2017] KEELC 1224 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1224 (KLR)

The court found that since Fredrick Clarence Kittany was deceased at the time the suit was filed, he lacked the legal capacity to institute the proceedings. The purported instructions from his son, Collins Kipchumba Ngetich Kittany, did not cure the defect as there was no evidence of legal representation or grant of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1224 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Fredrick Clarence Kittany; Defendant: Eastside Development Limited; Defendant: Nairobi City County
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 102 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
suit struck out and dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Capacity to Sue, Striking Out Suit, Deceased Litigant, Land Dispute
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Capacity to Sue Striking Out Suit Deceased Litigant Land Dispute

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Clarence Kittany

Plaintiff

Eastside Development Limited

Defendant

Nairobi City County

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the suit is competent where the named plaintiff was deceased at the time of filing.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be struck out for want of capacity by the plaintiff.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since Fredrick Clarence Kittany was deceased at the time the suit was filed, he lacked the legal capacity to institute the proceedings. The purported instructions from his son, Collins Kipchumba Ngetich Kittany, did not cure the defect as there was no evidence of legal representation or grant of letters of administration. Consequently, the suit was a nullity ab initio and could not be sustained in law. The court therefore struck out and dismissed the suit with costs to be borne by the purported plaintiff, as prayed in the Notice of Motion.

Court Disposition

suit struck out and dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 13th January 2017 is allowed in its entirety as per prayers 2, 3, and 4.
  • The suit is struck out and dismissed with costs to be borne by the purported plaintiff.