[2018] KEHC 3922 (KLR)
The appellate court found that while the trial magistrate considered both the Probation Office's recommendation for a non-custodial sentence and the complainant's desire for a custodial sentence, the three-year imprisonment imposed was excessive in light of the appellant's guilty plea and remorse. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 3922 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Fredrick Ocharo Ratemo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 6 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction affirmed, sentence reduced
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Assault Causing Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty, Mitigation, Appellate Review of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fredrick Ocharo Ratemo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the appellate court should interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial magistrate.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court found that while the trial magistrate considered both the Probation Office's recommendation for a non-custodial sentence and the complainant's desire for a custodial sentence, the three-year imprisonment imposed was excessive in light of the appellant's guilty plea and remorse. The court exercised its discretion to reduce the sentence to two years' imprisonment, affirming the conviction but finding that the circumstances warranted further leniency.
Court Disposition
conviction affirmed, sentence reduced
Orders
- The conviction is affirmed.
- The sentence is reduced to two years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYAMIRA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 6 OF 2018
FREDRICK OCHARO RATEMO.........................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC............................................................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from the original conviction and sentence of Hon. P. Wasike – RM dated 8th March 2018 at the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Keroka in Criminal Case No. 236 of 2018)
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant, FREDRICK OCHARO RATEMO, pleaded guilty for the offence of assault causing actual bodily harm contrary to section 251 of the Penal Code (Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya). It was alleged that on 24th January 2018 at Nyamasibi Sub-location in Masaba South Sub County, Kisii County he unlawfully assaulted JOSEPHINE KWAMBOKA SIMON. He was sentenced to three (3) years imprisonment.
2. At the hearing of the appeal, the appellant stated that he wanted the court to exercise leniency as he admitted the offence.
3. The Imposition of a sentence is the court’s discretion and the appellate court will only interfere if the trial magistrate erred in taking into account irrelevant facts, or failed to consider relevant facts. It may also intervene if the trial court erred in applying a particular principle or considering the circumstances as a whole, the sentence is harsh and excessive.
4. In this case the appellant assaulted his mother with a stick on the head causing her to bleed and fall as a result. Upon conviction, the appellant expressed remorse. The trial magistrate directed the Probation Office to prepare a sentence review report which recommended a non-custodial sentence as it appeared that the incident was caused by him in the course of his mother intervening in a fight between him and his sister.
5. At the sentencing hearing, the complaint stated that, “I pray that I have not healed, the accused should remain inside to get discipline. He will beat me again”.
6. Considering both the report and the complainant’s view, the trial magistrate imposed a sentence of three years.
7. Having considered the fact that the appellant pleaded guilty and was remorseful, I would reduce the sentence further to two (2) years imprisonment. Consequently the conviction is affirmed and the sentence is reduced to two (2) years imprisonment. Right of appeal explained.
Dated and delivered at Kisii this 21stday of September 2018.
D.S MAJANJA
JUDGE
Mr. Otieno, Senior Prosecution Counsel, instructed by Office of Director of Prosecutions.
Appellant in person.