[2016] KEHC 8284 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 8284 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to grant the applicant leave to file an appeal out of time, having considered the urgency and the reasons advanced. The application was certified as urgent and allowed, enabling the applicant to pursue the appeal process despite the lapse of the statutory period.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 8284 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fredrick Ochieng Okoa; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 375 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Criminal Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Out of Time Criminal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Ochieng Okoa

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant the applicant leave to file an appeal out of time, having considered the urgency and the reasons advanced. The application was certified as urgent and allowed, enabling the applicant to pursue the appeal process despite the lapse of the statutory period.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The application is certified urgent.
  • The application is allowed.