[2017] KECA 418 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal found that the High Court erred in its determination of the appellant's complaint regarding the party nomination process. The court held that the appellant's complaint, dated 5th June 2017, should have been determined on its merits by the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission (IEBC)....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KECA 418 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Fredrick Odhiambo Oyugi; Respondent: Orange Democratic Movement; Respondent: Jane Wangui; Respondent: Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 199 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal partially allowed; High Court judgment set aside; complaint remitted to IEBC for re-hearing; other prayers declined; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- GG Okwengu, AK Murgor
- Legal Topics
- Party Nominations, Election Disputes, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fredrick Odhiambo Oyugi
Appellant
Orange Democratic Movement
Respondent
Jane Wangui
Respondent
Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in its determination of the appellant's complaint regarding party nomination for Member of National Assembly, Embakasi North Constituency.
- 2 Whether the appellant's complaint should be remitted to the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission for re-hearing on merits.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal found that the High Court erred in its determination of the appellant's complaint regarding the party nomination process. The court held that the appellant's complaint, dated 5th June 2017, should have been determined on its merits by the Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission (IEBC). Given the urgency of the matter, with the general elections imminent, the court set aside the High Court's judgment and remitted the complaint to the IEBC for re-hearing and determination within 48 hours. The court declined to grant the other prayers sought by the appellant and ordered that each party bear their own costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal partially allowed; High Court judgment set aside; complaint remitted to IEBC for re-hearing; other prayers declined; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Prayers (a) and (b) of the appeal are allowed.
- The judgment of the High Court delivered on 22nd June, 2017 is set aside and substituted with an order remitting the appellant's complaint dated 5th June, 2017 to the IEBC for re-hearing and determination on merits within 48 hours from the date and time of delivery of this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
37 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: OKWENGU, GATEMBU & MURGOR, JJ.A)
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 199 OF 2017
BETWEEN
FREDRICK ODHIAMBO OYUGI.....................................................................APPELLANT
AND
ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT..............................................1ST RESPONDENT
JANE WANGUI....................................................................................2ND RESPONDENT
INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL & BOUNDARIES COMMISSION....3RD RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi delivered on 22nd June, 2017 (Kimaru, J)
in
ELECTION PETITION APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2017)
******************************************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
1. Fredrick Odhiambo Oyugi, the appellant and Jane Wangui the 2nd respondent, aspire for the position of Member of the National Assembly representing Embakasi North Constituency Nairobi County. As members of the Orange Democratic Movement, the 1strespondent, they sought nomination by the Party for that position in a nomination exercise conducted on 30th April, 2017.
2. The appellant contends that he emerged the winner and was so declared by the 1st respondent’s Returning Officer for the said constituency and was issued with a provisional nomination certificate on 30th April, 2017 followed by a final nomination certificate on 3rd May, 2017.
3. This has resulted in a dispute that has escalated from the Political parties Dispute Tribunal to the High Court and is now before us in an appeal lodged by the appellant against the judgment of the High Court.
4. We heard the appeal on 19th July, 2017 and having considered the appeal, the submissions and authorities cited, and due to the urgency in this matter, the IEBC being in the process of printing the ballot papers for the General Elections scheduled to be held on 8th August, 2017, we give our decision under Rule 32(5) of the Court of Appeal Rules as follows:
(i) that prayers (a) and (b) of the appeal is allowed;
(ii) that the judgment of the High Court delivered on 22nd June, 2017 is hereby set aside and substituted with an order that the appellant’s complaint dated 5th June, 2017 presented before the 3rd respondent be and is remitted back to the 3rd respondent for re-hearing and determination on merits within 48 hours from the date and time of delivery of the judgment of this Court;
(iii) that prayers nos. (c), (d) and (e) in the appellant’s memorandum of appeal dated 27th June, 2017 are declined.
(iv) that each party shall bear their own costs in this appeal.
(v) that we reserve reasons for this decision to be delivered on 29th September, 2017.
Those shall be the orders of this Court.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 21st day of July, 2017.
H. M. OKWENGU
…………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S. GATEMBU KAIRU, FCIArb
………………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A. K. MURGOR
………………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR