[2011] KEHC 494 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 494 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant had made sufficient efforts to serve the respondents personally, including attempts to trace them and confirmation that their previous advocate was no longer on record. Given these circumstances, and in the absence of any opposition, the court exercised its discretion to allow...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KEHC 494 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Fredrick Oenga Nyamwega; Respondent: Hilltop Taxis Ltd; Respondent: Barnabas Kiprop Leting
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 537 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Substituted Service Pending Appeal Hearing
Outcome
Application for substituted service allowed.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Personal Injury, Substituted Service, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Tort Law Civil Procedure Negligence Personal Injury Substituted Service Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Oenga Nyamwega

Appellant

Hilltop Taxis Ltd

Respondent

Barnabas Kiprop Leting

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Substituted Service Pending Appeal Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the appellant demonstrated sufficient efforts to serve the respondents personally.
  2. 2 Whether substituted service by registered post should be allowed in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant had made sufficient efforts to serve the respondents personally, including attempts to trace them and confirmation that their previous advocate was no longer on record. Given these circumstances, and in the absence of any opposition, the court exercised its discretion to allow substituted service by registered post to the respondents' last known address. The court further directed that proof of posting and an affidavit of service be provided to ensure compliance with procedural requirements.

Court Disposition

Application for substituted service allowed.

Orders

  • Substituted service of all required documents to be effected by registered post to the respondents' last known address.
  • Applicant to retain an envelope with equivalent stamps as the one sent.