[2021] KEELRC 2033 (KLR)
The court found that the Secretary-General of the Kenya National Union of Teachers acted without lawful authority in suspending the Claimant from his position as male member of the Branch Executive Council. The Union’s Constitution does not vest suspension powers in the Secretary-General; instead, such powers are...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELRC 2033 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Fredrick Okango Nyangweso; Respondent: Kenya National Union of Teachers, Mumias Branch; Respondent: Kenya National Union of Teachers
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause E010 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; suspension declared unlawful and nullified; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Governance, Disciplinary Procedure, Suspension of Officials
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fredrick Okango Nyangweso
Claimant
Kenya National Union of Teachers, Mumias Branch
Respondent
Kenya National Union of Teachers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary-General of the Kenya National Union of Teachers had lawful authority under the Union Constitution to suspend the Claimant from his elective position.
- 2 Whether the suspension of the Claimant was conducted in accordance with the procedures set out in the Union Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Secretary-General of the Kenya National Union of Teachers acted without lawful authority in suspending the Claimant from his position as male member of the Branch Executive Council. The Union’s Constitution does not vest suspension powers in the Secretary-General; instead, such powers are reserved for the Branch Executive Council, subject to ratification by the Branch General Meeting. No evidence was presented to show that the Branch Executive Council met or recommended the Claimant’s suspension, nor that the proper procedures were followed. The purported suspension was therefore unlawful, ultra vires, and contrary to the Union’s Constitution. The court declared...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; suspension declared unlawful and nullified; no order as to costs.
Orders
- A declaration is hereby issued that the Claimant's suspension as male member EAST Wanga, Branch Executive Council Branch made on or about 14/8/2020 by the KNUT Secretary-General Hon. Wilson Sossion was/is unlawful and against the Union’s Constitution, and the same is nullified.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT KISUMU
CAUSE NO. E010 OF 2021
FREDRICK OKANGO NYANGWESO............................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
KENYA NATIONAL UNION OF TEACHERS
MUMIAS BRANCH................................................1st RESPONDENT
KENYA NATIONAL UNION OF
TEACHERS.............................................................2nd RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. Fredrick Okango Nyangweso (the Claimant) instituted these proceedings against the Kenya National Union of Teachers, Mumias Branch and the Kenya National Union of Teachers
2. (the Respondents) on 27 January 2021, alleging that her suspension as East Wanga, male member to the Branch Executive Council by Hon. Wilson Sossion, the Secretary-General of the Kenya National Union of Teachers, on 14 August 2020 contravened the Union’s Constitution.
3. The Claimant sought the following remedies:
(i) A declaration that the decision of change of officials of the Union made on or about 14/8/2020 by the KNUT Secretary-General Hon Wilson Sossion in suspending the Claimant as the BEC (MUMIAS EAST), KNUT MUMIAS Branch is unlawful and against the Union Constitution, and the same be nullified and or quashed.
(ii) Costs of this Claim be paid by the Respondents.
4. On the same day, the Claimant filed a Motion under a certificate of urgency seeking interlocutory relief.
5. When the Motion came up for directions on 3 February 2021, the Court directed that it would be taken together with the Cause.
6. The Court gave comprehensive directions on the filing and exchange of pleadings and submissions ahead of the delivery of judgment today.
7. The Respondents did not file a Response (should have been filed and served before 10 February 2021). The Court will treat the Cause as undefended.
8. The parties did not file submissions.
Evaluation
9. The Court has considered the record and identified one primary question for determination, whether the Secretary-General could lawfully suspend the Claimant from his elective position of the male member to the Branch Executive Council.
10. In purporting to suspend the Claimant on 14 August 2020, the Secretary-General invoked section 14(5) and Article 14(5) of the Union’s Constitution. The suspension letter indicated that the decision was unanimous.
11. The Court has keenly perused the Constitution of the Union. Article 14(5) does not vest any suspension powers on the Secretary-General. It establishes certain acts of professional misconduct and discipline.
12. The relevant provision on the suspension of branch officials is Article X(C)(5)(l) of the Constitution.
13. Under the Article, the power to suspend a branch official is reposed to the Branch Executive Council. The decision is, however, subject to ratification by the Branch General Meeting. An appeal to the National Executive Council is provided for.
14. Absolutely no material was placed before the Court to suggest that the Branch Executive Council met and decided or recommended that the Claimant be suspended or be replaced.
15. The Court, therefore, has no hesitation in concluding that the Secretary-General exceeded or exercised a mandate he did not have.
Conclusion and Orders
16. It is in the public domain that it is the season for trade union elections currently, and the Claimant’s term would have naturally come to an end at the elections.
17. In light of the preceding, the order which recommends itself to the Court and which the Court hereby issues is that:
(i) A declaration be and is hereby issued that the Claimant's suspension as male member EAST Wanga, Branch Executive Council Branch made on or about 14/8/2020 by the KNUT Secretary-General Hon. Wilson Sossion was/is unlawful and against the Union’s Constitution, and the same is nullified.
18. No order on costs as the parties did not comply with court directions.
Delivered through Microsoft teams, dated and signed in Kisumu on this 3rd day of March 2021.
Radido Stephen, MCIArb
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Rakoro & Co. Advocates
For Respondents SMS Advocates, LLP
Court Assistant Chrispo Aura