[2020] KEELC 1698 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 1698 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had established an arguable case warranting leave to commence judicial review proceedings. To preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave and ordered that such leave operate as a stay of the cancellation of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 1698 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Fredrick Wekesa Machasio; Applicant: Patrick Wanjala Machasio; Respondent: The Assistant County Commissioner Webuye; Respondent: The Land Registrar Bungoma; Respondent: The County Surveyor
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 7 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Commence Judicial Review and Interim Stay
Outcome
Leave granted to commence judicial review; leave to operate as stay of cancellation of titles; directions for filing and service of substantive application and responses.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Land Title Cancellation, Interim Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Judicial Review Land Title Cancellation Interim Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fredrick Wekesa Machasio

Applicant

Patrick Wanjala Machasio

Applicant

The Assistant County Commissioner Webuye

Respondent

The Land Registrar Bungoma

Respondent

The County Surveyor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Commence Judicial Review and Interim Stay

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to commence judicial review proceedings against the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether the leave granted should operate as a stay of the cancellation of the specified land titles.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had established an arguable case warranting leave to commence judicial review proceedings. To preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable harm, the court exercised its discretion to grant leave and ordered that such leave operate as a stay of the cancellation of the applicants' land titles by the 2nd and 3rd respondents. The court further directed the applicants to file and serve the substantive application within 21 days, and the respondents to respond within 14 days of service, with further directions to be given at a later date.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to commence judicial review; leave to operate as stay of cancellation of titles; directions for filing and service of substantive application and responses.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicants to commence judicial review proceedings in terms of prayer No. 2.
  • The leave shall operate as a stay of the cancellation of titles NDIVISI/MUCHI/10442, 10443, and 10444 by the 2nd and 3rd respondents.